Situational Awareness as an Instructable and Instructed Matter in Multi-Media Supported Debriefing: a Case Study from Aviation

dc.contributor.authorRoth, Wolff-Michael
dc.contributor.authorJornet, Alfredo
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-06T13:06:38Z
dc.date.available2020-06-06T13:06:38Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractDebriefing is an important practice for learning from experience especially in high-risk industries, including the medical field and aviation. Although it might be assumed that tools aiding in representing the events to be debriefed will improve the learning outcomes, meta-analytic studies appear to show that there is no advantage to debriefing sessions that use videos. Simultaneously, such meta-analytic studies are calling for process-related investigations of debriefing generally and those focusing on representational tools more specifically. In this study, we provide an exemplary interaction analysis of debriefing meetings in aviation that immediately follow 4-hour examination sessions. We examine how situational awareness—a crucial feature of aircraft piloting performance—becomes an instructable and instructed matter in and through the meetings. We exhibit the anchoring role of the tool, the opportunities for distinguishing knowledge from performance components, and the opportunities for anchoring third-person perspectives of performance to embodied knowing.de
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10606-015-9234-5
dc.identifier.pissn1573-7551
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-015-9234-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3856
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 24, No. 5
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
dc.subjectDebriefing
dc.subjectEmbodiment
dc.subjectLearning
dc.subjectMemory
dc.subjectRe-presentation
dc.subjectSituational awareness
dc.subjectTechnology-rich workplace
dc.subjectTool mediation
dc.titleSituational Awareness as an Instructable and Instructed Matter in Multi-Media Supported Debriefing: a Case Study from Aviationde
dc.typeText/Journal Article
gi.citation.endPage508
gi.citation.startPage461
gi.citations.count14
gi.citations.elementMagnus Hontvedt, Kjell Ivar Øvergård (2019): Simulations at Work —a Framework for Configuring Simulation Fidelity with Training Objectives, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1-2(29), doi:10.1007/s10606-019-09367-8
gi.citations.elementWolff-Michael Roth (2015): Flight Examiners’ Methods of Ascertaining Pilot Proficiency, In: The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3-4(25), doi:10.1080/10508414.2015.1162642
gi.citations.elementCharlott Sellberg, Olle Lindmark, Hans Rystedt (2018): Learning to navigate: the centrality of instructions and assessments for developing students’ professional competencies in simulator-based training, In: WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs 2(17), doi:10.1007/s13437-018-0139-2
gi.citations.elementCharlott Sellberg, Mona Lundin (2017): Tasks and instructions on the simulated bridge: Discourses of temporality in maritime training, In: Discourse Studies 2(20), doi:10.1177/1461445617734956
gi.citations.elementMustafa I Hussain, Mayara Costa Figueiredo, Brian D Tran, Zhaoyuan Su, Stephen Molldrem, Elizabeth V Eikey, Yunan Chen (2020): A scoping review of qualitative research in<i>JAMIA:</i>past contributions and opportunities for future work, In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2(28), doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa179
gi.citations.elementGustav Lymer, Björn Sjöblom (2024): Interaction in post-simulation debriefing, In: Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100855
gi.citations.elementYushan Pan, Arnfinn Oksavik, Hans Petter Hildre (2020): Making Sense of Maritime Simulators Use: A Multiple Case Study in Norway, In: Technology, Knowledge and Learning 3(26), doi:10.1007/s10758-020-09451-9
gi.citations.elementLinda Hirsch, Christina Schneegass, Robin Welsch, Andreas Butz (2021): To See or Not to See, In: Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1(5), doi:10.1145/3448123
gi.citations.elementR. Keith Sawyer (2021): Teaching creative thinking: how design professors externalize their creative thinking in studio classroom talk, In: Mind, Culture, and Activity 1(29), doi:10.1080/10749039.2021.1893337
gi.citations.elementTimothy John Mavin, Yoriko Kikkawa, Stephen Billett (2018): Key contributing factors to learning through debriefings: commercial aviation pilots’ perspectives, In: International Journal of Training Research 2(16), doi:10.1080/14480220.2018.1501906
gi.citations.elementGiolo Fele, Gian Marco Campagnolo (2023): Seeing bad luck: player participation to tactical video analysis in amateur football, In: Sports Coaching Review 1(13), doi:10.1080/21640629.2023.2275396
gi.citations.elementChris Campbell, Wolff-Michael Roth, Alfredo Jornet (2018): Collaborative design decision-making as social process, In: European Journal of Engineering Education 3(44), doi:10.1080/03043797.2018.1465028
gi.citations.elementYoriko Kikkawa, Timothy J. Mavin (2017): Integrated Digitised Video Recordings in Postflight-Simulator Training: A Matter of Reflection, In: Professional and Practice-based Learning, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63257-5_8
gi.citations.elementWolff-Michael Roth (2019): Remembering, In: Cultural Psychology of Education, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04242-4_8

Files