The Role of Expectations in Human-Computer Interaction
Loading...
Fulltext URI
Document type
Additional Information
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
Abstract
This paper describes a pilot study on the role of expectations in human-computer interaction on a decision-making task. Participants (N=70) were randomly assigned to one of 5 different computer partners or to a human partner. After completing the rankings for the Desert Survival Task, participants engaged in a dialog with their computer or human partners. Results revealed that interaction with human partners was more expected and more positively evaluated than interaction with computer agents. In addition, the addition of human-like qualities to computer interfaces did not increase expectedness or evaluations as predicted. Correlation analysis for the five computer conditions demonstrated that expectations and evaluations do effect influence and perceptions of the partner. Discussion focuses on ways to coordinate expectations, interface design, and task objectives.
Description
Keywords
computer-mediated communication, interactivity, human-computer interaction, expectations
Citation
URI
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Number of citations to item: 18
- Christine Guo Yu, Alan F. Blackwell, Ian Cross (2021): Perception of rhythmic agency for conversational labeling, In: Human–Computer Interaction 1(38), doi:10.1080/07370024.2021.1877541
- George Veletsianos (2010): Contextually relevant pedagogical agents: Visual appearance, stereotypes, and first impressions and their impact on learning, In: Computers & Education 2(55), doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.019
- Joo‐Wha Hong (2021): Artificial intelligence (<scp>AI</scp>), don't surprise me and stay in your lane: An experimental testing of perceiving humanlike performances of AI, In: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 5(3), doi:10.1002/hbe2.292
- Hannakaisa Isomäki (2010): Information Systems Development as an Intellectual Process: Designers’ Perceptions of Users, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work, doi:10.1007/978-1-84996-347-3_6
- Nick Yee, Jeremy N Bailenson, Kathryn Rickertsen (2007): A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces, In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doi:10.1145/1240624.1240626
- Ricardo Jota, Pedro Lopes, Joaquim Jorge (2012): I, the device, In: CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doi:10.1145/2212776.2212804
- Alina S. Larson, Jean E. Fox Tree (2023): Framing, more than speech, affects how machine agents are perceived, In: Behaviour & Information Technology 14(43), doi:10.1080/0144929x.2023.2278086
- Aobo Jin, Qixin Deng, Zhigang Deng (2020): A Live Speech-Driven Avatar-Mediated Three-Party Telepresence System: Design and Evaluation, In: PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality, doi:10.1162/pres_a_00358
- Judee K. Burgoon, Joseph A. Bonito, Paul Benjamin Lowry, Sean L. Humpherys, Gregory D. Moody, James E. Gaskin, Justin Scott Giboney (2016): Application of Expectancy Violations Theory to communication with and judgments about embodied agents during a decision-making task, In: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.02.002
- E. Aharoni, A.J. Fridlund (2007): Social reactions toward people vs. computers: How mere lables shape interactions, In: Computers in Human Behavior 5(23), doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.019
- Tonya Nguyen, Sabriya Alam, Cathy Hu, Catherine Albiston, Niloufar Salehi (2024): Definitions of Fairness Differ Across Socioeconomic Groups & Shape Perceptions of Algorithmic Decisions, In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction CSCW2(8), doi:10.1145/3687058
- Chang Yun, Zhigang Deng, Merrill Hiscock (2009): Can local avatars satisfy a global audience? A case study of high-fidelity 3D facial avatar animation in subject identification and emotion perception by US and international groups, In: Computers in Entertainment 2(7), doi:10.1145/1541895.1541901
- S Rafaeli, A Noy (2002): Online auctions, messaging, communication and social facilitation: a simulation and experimental evidence, In: European Journal of Information Systems 3(11), doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000434
- A. Sackl, R. Schatz, A. Raake (2017): More than I ever wanted or just good enough? User expectations and subjective quality perception in the context of networked multimedia services, In: Quality and User Experience 1(2), doi:10.1007/s41233-016-0004-z
- J.K Burgoon, J.A Bonito, B Bengtsson, C Cederberg, M Lundeberg, L Allspach (2000): Interactivity in human–computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence, In: Computers in Human Behavior 6(16), doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(00)00029-7
- Joo Wha Hong, Qiyao Peng, Dmitri Williams (2020): Are you ready for artificial Mozart and Skrillex? An experiment testing expectancy violation theory and AI music, In: New Media & Society 7(23), doi:10.1177/1461444820925798
- Muhanna Muhanna, Sergiu Dascalu, Frederick C. Harris, Sherif Elfass, Marcel Karam (2008): Specification and Design Aspects of the Academic Researcher's Assistant (ARA) Software for Mobile Devices, In: First International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction, doi:10.1109/achi.2008.48
- Angela Chang, Sile O'Modhrain, Rob Jacob, Eric Gunther, Hiroshi Ishii (2002): ComTouch, In: Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, doi:10.1145/778712.778755