Journal Article

Groupware Environments as Action Constitutive Resources: A Social Action Framework for Analyzing Groupware Technologies

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Fulltext URI

Document type

Text/Journal Article

Additional Information

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Abstract

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) is a relatively new and dynamic field dealing with the development and use of groupware technologies in organizations. Several frameworks and models have been proposed for studying CSCW, each conveying a different perspective and theoretical basis. Although these frameworks have contributed much to our understanding of the field, they can be criticized for a lack of holistic understanding of the complex social activity that is constitutive of groupwork. This often leads to the failure of otherwise well designed CSCW applications. In this paper we take up this challenge and propose a social action framework for analyzing groupware technologies. The framework is based on Habermas's theory of social action and four action categories, and the idea that groupware applications serve as sets of rules and resources which mediate group interactions. We demonstrate the value of the framework by analyzing a wide range of existing groupware technologies for their appropriateness to specific groupwork situations in terms of their espoused or implicit assumptions of groupwork, and the action constitutive resources they provide. Our analysis points out that a host of current groupware applications can be fairly easily classified and examined by the way they are configured to support different types of social action. It also suggests that, when implementing groupware applications, developers should critically evaluate: (a) the need for supporting a rich variety of action types, (b) the possible role of computer support in the specific groupwork situations, and (c) the underlying assumptions of groupwork embedded in the groupware platform. Finally, we will discuss how the framework can inform future research and development in the field.

Description

Ngwenyama, Ojelanki K.; Lyytinen, Kalle J. (1997): Groupware Environments as Action Constitutive Resources: A Social Action Framework for Analyzing Groupware Technologies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 6, No. 1. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008600220584. Springer. PISSN: 1573-7551. pp. 71-93

Keywords

collaboration technology, communication systems, Computer supported cooperative work, coordination systems, decision support systems, group support systems, groupware, social action theory

Citation

URI

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By


Number of citations to item: 36

  • Poppy Lauretta McLeod (1999): A Literary Examination of Electronic Meeting System Use in Everyday Organizational Life, In: The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2(35), doi:10.1177/0021886399352004
  • Henry Linger (1999): Utilising Knowledge Resources: An Activity Perspective of Knowledge Management, In: BIS ’99, doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0875-7_8
  • Chul-Nyuon Kim, Sang-Ho Lee (2016): A Study on Composing direction about Mobile Unified Communication Service based on Theory of Communicative Action, In: Journal of Digital Convergence 9(14), doi:10.14400/jdc.2016.14.9.251
  • Pär J Ågerfalk, Owen Eriksson (2006): Socio–instrumental Usability: IT is all about Social Action<sup>1</sup>, In: Journal of Information Technology 1(21), doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000055
  • Sean Hansen, Nicholas Berente, Kalle Lyytinen (2007): Wikipedia as Rational Discourse: An Illustration of the Emancipatory Potential of Information Systems, In: 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07), doi:10.1109/hicss.2007.616
  • Arjen Adriaanse, Hans Voordijk (2005): Interorganizational communication and ICT in construction projects: a review using metatriangulation, In: Construction Innovation 3(5), doi:10.1108/14714170510815230
  • Noriko Hara (2007): Information Technology Support for Communities of Practice: How Public Defenders Learn About Winning and Losing in Court, In: SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:10.2139/ssrn.1520303
  • Sudarshan Sreeram, Lokesh Shanmugam (2018): EMBED-X: An Integrated Methodology for Human - Robotic Systems Development and Interaction, In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), doi:10.1109/smc.2018.00664
  • Hung-Pin Shih (2009): Predicting Groupware Use from the Perspectives of Workflow, Information and Coordination, In: 2009 Seventh International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing, doi:10.1109/c5.2009.12
  • Kalle Lyytinen, Ojelanki Ngwenyama (1999): Sharrock and Button ... and Much Ado about Nothing, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3(8), doi:10.1023/a:1008720609782
  • David Hinds, Ronald M. Lee (2000): Communication Network Characteristics of Open Source Communities, In: Multi-Disciplinary Advancement in Open Source Software and Processes, doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-513-1.ch012
  • Yuanzhu Zhan, Yangchun Xiong, Runyue Han, Hugo K.S. Lam, Constantin Blome (2024): The impact of artificial intelligence adoption for business-to-business marketing on shareholder reaction: A social actor perspective, In: International Journal of Information Management, doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102768
  • Philippe Eynaud, Adrien Laurent (2021): Philosophie et outils de gestion, In: Philosophie et outils de gestion, doi:10.3917/ems.gilbe.2021.02.0029
  • Hans Voordijk, Arjen Adriaanse (2016): Engaged scholarship in construction management research: the adoption of information and communications technology in construction projects, In: Construction Management and Economics 7-8(34), doi:10.1080/01446193.2016.1139145
  • Sean Hansen, Nicholas Berente, Kalle Lyytinen (2009): Wikipedia, Critical Social Theory, and the Possibility of Rational Discourse, In: The Information Society 1(25), doi:10.1080/01972240802587562
  • Nada Korac-Kakabadse, Alexander Kouzmin, Andrew Korac-Kakabadse (2000): Information Technology-Enabled Communication and Organizational Effectiveness, In: International Review of Public Administration 1(5), doi:10.1080/12294659.2000.10804941
  • Hanne Westh Nicolajsen (2008): Managing emerging and conflicting groupware use in organisations, In: Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication, doi:10.1145/1456536.1456586
  • Jack S. Goulding, Eric C.W. Lou (2013): E-readiness in construction: an incongruous paradigm of variables, In: Architectural Engineering and Design Management 4(9), doi:10.1080/17452007.2013.775099
  • David J. Schaefer, Brenda Dervin (2000): Online Learning in Discussion Groups, In: User-Driven Healthcare and Narrative Medicine, doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-097-6.ch020
  • Noriko Hara (2006): Information technology support for communities of practice: How public defenders learn about winning and losing in court, In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 1(58), doi:10.1002/asi.20445
  • Arjen Adriaanse, Hans Voordijk, Geert Dewulf (2010): The use of interorganisational ICT in construction projects: a critical perspective, In: Construction Innovation 2(10), doi:10.1108/14714171011037200
  • Jill Owen, Henry Linger (2008): Resolving Emergent Issues in Complex Projects: A Knowledge Management Approach, In: Information Systems Development, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_39
  • Ojelanki Ngwenyama, Pernille Bjørn (2008): Interrogating the dynamics of distributed collaboration: findings from four field studies on CSCW use, In: Journal of Information Technology, doi:10.1057/jit.2008.25
  • Nasos Nikas, Angeliki Poulymenakou (2006): Examining the Emerging Dynamics of an Information Infrastructure, In: Managing Dynamic Networks, doi:10.1007/3-540-32884-x_9
  • Corey Jackson, Kevin Crowston, Carsten Østerlund, Mahboobeh Harandi (2018): Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3-6(27), doi:10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z
  • Pär J Ågerfalk, Göran Goldkuhl, Brian Fitzgerald, Liam Bannon (2006): Reflecting on action in language, organisations and information systems, In: European Journal of Information Systems 1(15), doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000607
  • Wietske Van Osch, Constantinos K. Coursaris (2017): A Strategic Social Action Framework: Theorizing and analyzing the alignment of social media affordances and organizational social action, In: Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 2(27), doi:10.1080/10919392.2017.1297643
  • J. Iivari, H. Linger (1999): Knowledge work as collaborative work: a situated activity theory view, In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers, doi:10.1109/hicss.1999.772702
  • Pernille Bjørn, Ojelanki Ngwenyama (2009): Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence, In: Information Systems Journal 3(19), doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00281.x
  • Matti Nelimarkka, Antti Salovaara, Bryan Semaan, Giulio Jacucci (2017): Theory-Driven Collocated CMC, In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doi:10.1145/3025453.3025885
  • Spyros Vosinakis, Panayiotis Koutsabasis, Modestos Stavrakis, Nikos Viorres, John Darzentas (2008): Virtual environments for collaborative design: requirements and guidelines from a social action perspective, In: CoDesign 3(4), doi:10.1080/15710880802250112
  • Noriko Hara, Rob Kling (2002): Communities of practice with and without information technology, In: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 1(39), doi:10.1002/meet.1450390137
  • Jesús Tramullas, Piedad Garrido-Picazo, Ana-Isabel Sánchez-Casabón (2011): &lt;i&gt;Groupware&lt;/i&gt; y software social: propuesta de marco de evaluación analítica para herramientas de software libre, In: El Profesional de la Informacion 4(20), doi:10.3145/epi.2011.jul.16
  • Steve Sawyer, Steven Haynes, Duane Truex, Ojelanki Ngwenyama (2001): What Do We Mean by Information Technology? Perspectives on Studying Computing, In: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-35489-7_30
  • Pär J Ågerfalk (2004): Investigating actability dimensions: a language/action perspective on criteria for information systems evaluation, In: Interacting with Computers 5(16), doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2004.05.002
  • David Hinds, Ronald M. Lee (2009): Communication Network Characteristics of Open Source Communities, In: International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes 4(1), doi:10.4018/jossp.2009100102
Please note: Providing information about citations is only possible thanks to to the open metadata APIs provided by crossref.org and opencitations.net. These lists may be incomplete due to unavailable citation data.source: opencitations.net, crossref.org