Groupware Environments as Action Constitutive Resources: A Social Action Framework for Analyzing Groupware Technologies

dc.contributor.authorNgwenyama, Ojelanki K.
dc.contributor.authorLyytinen, Kalle J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-06T06:24:21Z
dc.date.available2020-06-06T06:24:21Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.date.issued1997
dc.description.abstractComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) is a relatively new and dynamic field dealing with the development and use of groupware technologies in organizations. Several frameworks and models have been proposed for studying CSCW, each conveying a different perspective and theoretical basis. Although these frameworks have contributed much to our understanding of the field, they can be criticized for a lack of holistic understanding of the complex social activity that is constitutive of groupwork. This often leads to the failure of otherwise well designed CSCW applications. In this paper we take up this challenge and propose a social action framework for analyzing groupware technologies. The framework is based on Habermas's theory of social action and four action categories, and the idea that groupware applications serve as sets of rules and resources which mediate group interactions. We demonstrate the value of the framework by analyzing a wide range of existing groupware technologies for their appropriateness to specific groupwork situations in terms of their espoused or implicit assumptions of groupwork, and the action constitutive resources they provide. Our analysis points out that a host of current groupware applications can be fairly easily classified and examined by the way they are configured to support different types of social action. It also suggests that, when implementing groupware applications, developers should critically evaluate: (a) the need for supporting a rich variety of action types, (b) the possible role of computer support in the specific groupwork situations, and (c) the underlying assumptions of groupwork embedded in the groupware platform. Finally, we will discuss how the framework can inform future research and development in the field.de
dc.identifier.doi10.1023/A:1008600220584
dc.identifier.pissn1573-7551
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008600220584
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3508
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 6, No. 1
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
dc.subjectcollaboration technology
dc.subjectcommunication systems
dc.subjectComputer supported cooperative work
dc.subjectcoordination systems
dc.subjectdecision support systems
dc.subjectgroup support systems
dc.subjectgroupware
dc.subjectsocial action theory
dc.titleGroupware Environments as Action Constitutive Resources: A Social Action Framework for Analyzing Groupware Technologiesde
dc.typeText/Journal Article
gi.citation.endPage93
gi.citation.startPage71
gi.citations.count36
gi.citations.elementPoppy Lauretta McLeod (1999): A Literary Examination of Electronic Meeting System Use in Everyday Organizational Life, In: The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2(35), doi:10.1177/0021886399352004
gi.citations.elementHenry Linger (1999): Utilising Knowledge Resources: An Activity Perspective of Knowledge Management, In: BIS ’99, doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0875-7_8
gi.citations.elementChul-Nyuon Kim, Sang-Ho Lee (2016): A Study on Composing direction about Mobile Unified Communication Service based on Theory of Communicative Action, In: Journal of Digital Convergence 9(14), doi:10.14400/jdc.2016.14.9.251
gi.citations.elementPär J Ågerfalk, Owen Eriksson (2006): Socio–instrumental Usability: IT is all about Social Action<sup>1</sup>, In: Journal of Information Technology 1(21), doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000055
gi.citations.elementSean Hansen, Nicholas Berente, Kalle Lyytinen (2007): Wikipedia as Rational Discourse: An Illustration of the Emancipatory Potential of Information Systems, In: 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07), doi:10.1109/hicss.2007.616
gi.citations.elementArjen Adriaanse, Hans Voordijk (2005): Interorganizational communication and ICT in construction projects: a review using metatriangulation, In: Construction Innovation 3(5), doi:10.1108/14714170510815230
gi.citations.elementNoriko Hara (2007): Information Technology Support for Communities of Practice: How Public Defenders Learn About Winning and Losing in Court, In: SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:10.2139/ssrn.1520303
gi.citations.elementSudarshan Sreeram, Lokesh Shanmugam (2018): EMBED-X: An Integrated Methodology for Human - Robotic Systems Development and Interaction, In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), doi:10.1109/smc.2018.00664
gi.citations.elementHung-Pin Shih (2009): Predicting Groupware Use from the Perspectives of Workflow, Information and Coordination, In: 2009 Seventh International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing, doi:10.1109/c5.2009.12
gi.citations.elementKalle Lyytinen, Ojelanki Ngwenyama (1999): Sharrock and Button ... and Much Ado about Nothing, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3(8), doi:10.1023/a:1008720609782
gi.citations.elementDavid Hinds, Ronald M. Lee (2000): Communication Network Characteristics of Open Source Communities, In: Multi-Disciplinary Advancement in Open Source Software and Processes, doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-513-1.ch012
gi.citations.elementYuanzhu Zhan, Yangchun Xiong, Runyue Han, Hugo K.S. Lam, Constantin Blome (2024): The impact of artificial intelligence adoption for business-to-business marketing on shareholder reaction: A social actor perspective, In: International Journal of Information Management, doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102768
gi.citations.elementPhilippe Eynaud, Adrien Laurent (2021): Philosophie et outils de gestion, In: Philosophie et outils de gestion, doi:10.3917/ems.gilbe.2021.02.0029
gi.citations.elementHans Voordijk, Arjen Adriaanse (2016): Engaged scholarship in construction management research: the adoption of information and communications technology in construction projects, In: Construction Management and Economics 7-8(34), doi:10.1080/01446193.2016.1139145
gi.citations.elementSean Hansen, Nicholas Berente, Kalle Lyytinen (2009): Wikipedia, Critical Social Theory, and the Possibility of Rational Discourse, In: The Information Society 1(25), doi:10.1080/01972240802587562
gi.citations.elementNada Korac-Kakabadse, Alexander Kouzmin, Andrew Korac-Kakabadse (2000): Information Technology-Enabled Communication and Organizational Effectiveness, In: International Review of Public Administration 1(5), doi:10.1080/12294659.2000.10804941
gi.citations.elementHanne Westh Nicolajsen (2008): Managing emerging and conflicting groupware use in organisations, In: Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication, doi:10.1145/1456536.1456586
gi.citations.elementJack S. Goulding, Eric C.W. Lou (2013): E-readiness in construction: an incongruous paradigm of variables, In: Architectural Engineering and Design Management 4(9), doi:10.1080/17452007.2013.775099
gi.citations.elementDavid J. Schaefer, Brenda Dervin (2000): Online Learning in Discussion Groups, In: User-Driven Healthcare and Narrative Medicine, doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-097-6.ch020
gi.citations.elementNoriko Hara (2006): Information technology support for communities of practice: How public defenders learn about winning and losing in court, In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 1(58), doi:10.1002/asi.20445
gi.citations.elementArjen Adriaanse, Hans Voordijk, Geert Dewulf (2010): The use of interorganisational ICT in construction projects: a critical perspective, In: Construction Innovation 2(10), doi:10.1108/14714171011037200
gi.citations.elementJill Owen, Henry Linger (2008): Resolving Emergent Issues in Complex Projects: A Knowledge Management Approach, In: Information Systems Development, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_39
gi.citations.elementOjelanki Ngwenyama, Pernille Bjørn (2008): Interrogating the dynamics of distributed collaboration: findings from four field studies on CSCW use, In: Journal of Information Technology, doi:10.1057/jit.2008.25
gi.citations.elementNasos Nikas, Angeliki Poulymenakou (2006): Examining the Emerging Dynamics of an Information Infrastructure, In: Managing Dynamic Networks, doi:10.1007/3-540-32884-x_9
gi.citations.elementCorey Jackson, Kevin Crowston, Carsten Østerlund, Mahboobeh Harandi (2018): Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3-6(27), doi:10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z
gi.citations.elementPär J Ågerfalk, Göran Goldkuhl, Brian Fitzgerald, Liam Bannon (2006): Reflecting on action in language, organisations and information systems, In: European Journal of Information Systems 1(15), doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000607
gi.citations.elementWietske Van Osch, Constantinos K. Coursaris (2017): A Strategic Social Action Framework: Theorizing and analyzing the alignment of social media affordances and organizational social action, In: Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 2(27), doi:10.1080/10919392.2017.1297643
gi.citations.elementJ. Iivari, H. Linger (1999): Knowledge work as collaborative work: a situated activity theory view, In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers, doi:10.1109/hicss.1999.772702
gi.citations.elementPernille Bjørn, Ojelanki Ngwenyama (2009): Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence, In: Information Systems Journal 3(19), doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00281.x
gi.citations.elementMatti Nelimarkka, Antti Salovaara, Bryan Semaan, Giulio Jacucci (2017): Theory-Driven Collocated CMC, In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doi:10.1145/3025453.3025885
gi.citations.elementSpyros Vosinakis, Panayiotis Koutsabasis, Modestos Stavrakis, Nikos Viorres, John Darzentas (2008): Virtual environments for collaborative design: requirements and guidelines from a social action perspective, In: CoDesign 3(4), doi:10.1080/15710880802250112
gi.citations.elementNoriko Hara, Rob Kling (2002): Communities of practice with and without information technology, In: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 1(39), doi:10.1002/meet.1450390137
gi.citations.elementJesús Tramullas, Piedad Garrido-Picazo, Ana-Isabel Sánchez-Casabón (2011): &lt;i&gt;Groupware&lt;/i&gt; y software social: propuesta de marco de evaluación analítica para herramientas de software libre, In: El Profesional de la Informacion 4(20), doi:10.3145/epi.2011.jul.16
gi.citations.elementSteve Sawyer, Steven Haynes, Duane Truex, Ojelanki Ngwenyama (2001): What Do We Mean by Information Technology? Perspectives on Studying Computing, In: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-35489-7_30
gi.citations.elementPär J Ågerfalk (2004): Investigating actability dimensions: a language/action perspective on criteria for information systems evaluation, In: Interacting with Computers 5(16), doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2004.05.002
gi.citations.elementDavid Hinds, Ronald M. Lee (2009): Communication Network Characteristics of Open Source Communities, In: International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes 4(1), doi:10.4018/jossp.2009100102

Files