Text Document

How Practice Matters: A Relational View of Knowledge Sharing

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Fulltext URI

Document type

Text

Additional Information

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer London, Dordrecht Amsterdam

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of knowledge sharing practices in complex organizations. The authors propose that a refined understanding of the relational thinking underpinning practice theories is required if we want to further our comprehension of knowledge sharing and distinguish existing approaches. Knowledge sharing, we argue, is defined by the specific differences and dependencies in practices existing within or across communities. Changes in those differences and dependencies leads to the formation of new knowledge. Specifying the differences, dependencies and changes provides the first analytical step in understanding knowledge sharing as it takes shape in and across communities of practice. The authors apply this relational perspective to probe the discrepancies and complementarities among three seminal approaches to knowing within and across communities of practice.

Description

Østerlund, C.; Carlile, P. (2003): How Practice Matters: A Relational View of Knowledge Sharing. Communities and Technologies: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Communities and Technologies 2003. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0115-0_1. Springer London, Dordrecht Amsterdam. ISBN: 978-94-017-0115-0. pp. 1-22. Full Papers

Keywords

Citation

URI

URI

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By


Number of citations to item: 12

  • Siobhan O’Mahony, Karim R. Lakhani (2011): Organizations in the Shadow of Communities, In: SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:10.2139/ssrn.1873989
  • Howard Rosenbaum, Pnina Shachaf (2010): A structuration approach to online communities of practice: The case of Q&A communities, In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 9(61), doi:10.1002/asi.21340
  • Harry Scarbrough, Nikiforos S. Panourgias, Joe Nandhakumar (2014): Developing a Relational View of the Organizing Role of Objects: A study of the innovation process in computer games, In: Organization Studies 2(36), doi:10.1177/0170840614557213
  • Alyson Langley, Harshada Patel, Robert J. Houghton (2017): Fostering a Community of Practice for Industrial Processes, In: Dynamics of Long-Life Assets, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45438-2_9
  • Davide Nicolini (2011): Practice as the Site of Knowing: Insights from the Field of Telemedicine, In: Organization Science 3(22), doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0556
  • Bernhard Nett (2008): A Community of Practice among tutors enabling student participation in a seminar preparation, In: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1(3), doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9031-3
  • Irma Bogenrieder, Peter van Baalen (2007): Contested practice: multiple inclusion in double‐knit organizations, In: Journal of Organizational Change Management 4(20), doi:10.1108/09534810710760090
  • Rudi Schmiede (2000): Knowledge, Work and Subject in Informational Capitalism, In: IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-37876-3_27
  • Malgorzata Karolina Zielińska (2019): Migration and translocal learning, In: European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults 1(10), doi:10.3384/rela.2000-7426.ojs296
  • Davide Nicolini, Jeanne Mengis, Jacky Swan (2012): Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration, In: Organization Science 3(23), doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0664
  • Andrew Cox (2005): What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works, In: Journal of Information Science 6(31), doi:10.1177/0165551505057016
  • Markus Rohde, Leonard Reinecke, Bernd Pape, Monique Janneck (2004): Community-Building with Web-Based Systems ? Investigating a Hybrid Community of Students, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 5-6(13), doi:10.1007/s10606-004-5066-4
Please note: Providing information about citations is only possible thanks to to the open metadata APIs provided by crossref.org and opencitations.net. These lists may be incomplete due to unavailable citation data.source: opencitations.net, crossref.org