Developing complex group products: Idea combination in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorCummings, Anne
dc.contributor.authorSchlosser, Ann
dc.contributor.authorArrow, Holly
dc.date.issued1995
dc.description.abstractThis study examines how group experience, communication medium, and strategies for combining individual ideas influence the integrative complexity of group products. Each week for six weeks, members of 31 work groups wrote individual essays about their group tasks and experiences, and then collaborated on a group essay on the same topic. Results indicate that in the later weeks of the study, computer-mediated groups produce essays with higher integrative complexity than those of face-to-face groups. The integrative complexity of essays in later weeks is a joint function of the complexity of member ideas and the number of members who participate directly in writing the essay (scribes). The greater complexity of computer-mediated groups' essays in the later weeks of the study is partly accounted for by their use of more scribes and their inclusion of more unique member ideas.de
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/BF00749748
dc.identifier.pissn1573-7551
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3486
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 4, No. 2-3
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
dc.subjectcollaborative writing
dc.subjectcomputer-mediated communication
dc.subjectcomputer-supported collaborative work
dc.subjectgroup cognition
dc.subjectgroup learning
dc.subjectIntegrative complexity
dc.subjectsocial combination
dc.titleDeveloping complex group products: Idea combination in computer-mediated and face-to-face groupsen
dc.typeText/Journal Article
gi.citations.count18
gi.citations.elementDavid S. Stein, Constance E. Wanstreet, Hilda R. Glazer, Cheryl L. Engle, Ruth A. Harris, Susan M. Johnston, Mona R. Simons, Lynn A. Trinko (2007): Creating shared understanding through chats in a community of inquiry, In: The Internet and Higher Education 2(10), doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.02.002
gi.citations.elementCrina I. Damşa, Sten Ludvigsen (2016): Learning through interaction and co-construction of knowledge objects in teacher education, In: Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.03.001
gi.citations.elementNicolas Michinov, Corine Primois (2005): Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming, In: Computers in Human Behavior 1(21), doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.004
gi.citations.elementAnn E. Schlosser (2003): Computers as Situational Cues: Implications for Consumers Product Cognitions and Attitudes, In: Journal of Consumer Psychology 1-2(13), doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp13-1&2_09
gi.citations.elementGuido Hertel, Susanne Geister, Udo Konradt (2005): Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research, In: Human Resource Management Review 1(15), doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002
gi.citations.elementRadostina K. Purvanova, Renata Kenda (2021): The impact of virtuality on team effectiveness in organizational and non‐organizational teams: A meta‐analysis, In: Applied Psychology 3(71), doi:10.1111/apps.12348
gi.citations.element(2007): Back Matter, In: Telekooperation und virtuelle Teamarbeit, doi:10.1524/9783486594898.bm
gi.citations.elementAnne-Laure Fayard, Anca Metiu (2014): The Role of Writing in Distributed Collaboration, In: Organization Science 5(25), doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0893
gi.citations.elementConstance E. Wanstreet, David S. Stein (2011): Presence Over Time in Synchronous Communities of Inquiry, In: American Journal of Distance Education 3(25), doi:10.1080/08923647.2011.590062
gi.citations.elementJoseph E. Mcgrath, Holly Arrow (1996): Introduction: The JEMCO-2 Study of time, technology, and groups, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2-3(4), doi:10.1007/bf00749743
gi.citations.elementImad Samarah, Souren Paul, Suresh Tadisina (2008): Knowledge Conversion in GSS-Aided Virtual Teams: An Empirical Study, In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), doi:10.1109/hicss.2008.227
gi.citations.elementJoseph E. McGrath, Jennifer L. Berdahl (2002): Groups, Technology, and Time, In: Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues, doi:10.1007/0-306-47144-2_10
gi.citations.elementAnca M. Metiu, Bruce Kogut (2004): Distributed Knowledge and Creativity in the International Software Industry, In: Management International Review, doi:10.1007/978-3-322-91001-1_3
gi.citations.elementRajesh Singh (2013): Collaboration in the Cloud: Role of Interaction and Online Collaborative Tools in Enhancing Knowledge Creation in Virtual Environments, In: Journal of Information & Knowledge Management 04(12), doi:10.1142/s0219649213500305
gi.citations.elementImad Samarah, Souren Paul, Suresh Tadisina (2007): Collaboration Technology Support for Knowledge Conversion in Virtual Teams: A Theoretical Perspective, In: 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07), doi:10.1109/hicss.2007.129
gi.citations.elementJ. Fjerrnestad, S.R. Hiltz (2000): Experimental studies of group decision support systems: an assessment of variables studied and methodology, In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, doi:10.1109/hicss.1997.665461
gi.citations.elementZixing Shen, Kalle Lyytinen, Youngjin Yoo (2015): Time and information technology in teams: a review of empirical research and future research directions, In: European Journal of Information Systems 5(24), doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.8
gi.citations.elementMichael J. Richardson, Rick Dale, Kerry L. Marsh (2014): Complex Dynamical Systems in Social and Personality Psychology, In: Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, doi:10.1017/cbo9780511996481.015

Files

Collections

JCSCW Vol. 04 (1995)