“What are We Missing?” Usability’s Indexical Ground

dc.contributor.authorZemel, Alan
dc.contributor.authorKoschmann, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorLeBaron, Curtis
dc.contributor.authorFeltovich, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-06T13:07:37Z
dc.date.available2020-06-06T13:07:37Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we describe how usability provides the indexical ground upon which design work in a surgery is achieved. Indexical and deictic referential practices are used (1) to constitute participation frameworks and work sites in an instructional surgery and (2) to encode and manage participants’ differential access to the relevancies and background knowledge required for the achievement of a successful surgical outcome. As a site for both learning and work, the operating room afforded us the opportunity to examine how usability, which is a critical design consideration, can be used as a resource for learning in interaction. In our detailed analysis of the interaction among participants (both co-present and projected) we sought to describe a particular case of how usability was produced as a relevant consideration for surgical education in the operating room. In doing so, we demonstrate a set of members’ methods by which actors worked to establish and provide for the relevance of the anticipated needs of projected users as part of developing an understanding of their current activity.de
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10606-007-9065-0
dc.identifier.pissn1573-7551
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-007-9065-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/4005
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 17, No. 1
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
dc.subjectdeictic referential practices
dc.subjectindexical referential practices
dc.subjectusability
dc.title“What are We Missing?” Usability’s Indexical Groundde
dc.typeText/Journal Article
gi.citation.endPage85
gi.citation.startPage63
gi.citations.count18
gi.citations.elementChristian Greiffenhagen (2011): Making rounds: The routine work of the teacher during collaborative learning with computers, In: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1(7), doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9134-8
gi.citations.elementAlfredo Jornet, Rolf Steier (2015): The Matter of Space: Bodily Performances and the Emergence of Boundary Objects During Multidisciplinary Design Meetings, In: Mind, Culture, and Activity 2(22), doi:10.1080/10749039.2015.1024794
gi.citations.elementGustav Lymer (2009): Demonstrating Professional Vision: The Work of Critique in Architectural Education, In: Mind, Culture, and Activity 2(16), doi:10.1080/10749030802590580
gi.citations.elementMurat Perit Çakir, Alan Zemel, Gerry Stahl (2021): Investigation 12. The Joint Organization of Interaction Within a Multimodal CSCL Medium, In: Theoretical Investigations, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49157-4_12
gi.citations.elementAlan Zemel, Timothy Koschmann (2021): Investigation 5. Recalibrating Reference Within a Dual-Space Interaction Environment, In: Theoretical Investigations, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49157-4_5
gi.citations.elementAsta Cekaite (2009): Collaborative corrections with spelling control: Digital resources and peer assistance, In: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3(4), doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9067-7
gi.citations.element(2012): References, In: The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, doi:10.1002/9781118325001.refs
gi.citations.elementAug Nishizaka (2011): Touch without vision: Referential practice in a non-technological environment, In: Journal of Pragmatics 2(43), doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.07.015
gi.citations.elementAlan Zemel, Timothy Koschmann (2013): Recalibrating reference within a dual-space interaction environment, In: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1(8), doi:10.1007/s11412-013-9164-5
gi.citations.elementSatinder P. Gill (2015): Tacit Engagement, In: Tacit Engagement, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21620-1_1
gi.citations.elementTimothy Koschmann (2007): Introduction to Special Issue on Learning and Work, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1(17), doi:10.1007/s10606-007-9069-9
gi.citations.elementPaul Prior (2012): Multimodality and ESP Research, In: The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes, doi:10.1002/9781118339855.ch27
gi.citations.elementWolff-Michael Roth (2015): Cultural Practices and Cognition in Debriefing, In: Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 3(9), doi:10.1177/1555343415591395
gi.citations.elementUsree Bhattacharya (2019): ‘My school is a big school’: imagined communities, inclusion, and ideology in Indian textbooks, In: Journal of Curriculum Studies 5(51), doi:10.1080/00220272.2019.1567822
gi.citations.elementAnne Marie Piper, James D. Hollan (2009): Analyzing Multimodal Communication around a Shared Tabletop Display, In: ECSCW 2009, doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-854-4_17
gi.citations.elementMurat Perit Çakır, Alan Zemel, Gerry Stahl (2009): The joint organization of interaction within a multimodal CSCL medium, In: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2(4), doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9061-0
gi.citations.elementGustav Lymer, Jonas Ivarsson, Oskar Lindwall (2009): Contrasting the use of tools for presentation and critique: Some cases from architectural education, In: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4(4), doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9073-9
gi.citations.elementWolff-Michael Roth, Alfredo Jornet (2015): Situational Awareness as an Instructable and Instructed Matter in Multi-Media Supported Debriefing: a Case Study from Aviation, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 5(24), doi:10.1007/s10606-015-9234-5

Files