Rethinking Laboratory Notebooks

dc.contributor.authorKlokmose, Clemens Nylandsted
dc.contributor.authorZander, Pär-Ola
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-15T12:12:59Z
dc.date.available2017-04-15T12:12:59Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractWe take digitalization of laboratory work practice as a challenging design domain to explore. There are obvious drawbacks with the use of paper instead of ICT in the collaborative writing that takes place in laboratory notebooks
dc.description.abstractyet paper persist in being the most common solution. The ultimate aim with our study is to produce design relevant knowledge that can envisage an ICT solution that keeps as many advantages of paper as possible, but with the strength of electronic laboratory notebooks as well. Rather than assuming that users are technophobic and unable to appropriate state of the art software, we explore whether there are something inherent in current ICT infrastructure that invites resistance from the users. The method used is interviews, combined with a modified version of future workshops and the data are analyzed with activity theory. Our results concern issues of configurability, mobility, and the barrier between documentation and control, amongst other things.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-1-84996-211-7_8
dc.language.isoen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer, London
dc.relation.ispartofCOOP 2010: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Designing Cooperative Systems
dc.relation.ispartofseriesC&T
dc.titleRethinking Laboratory Notebooks
dc.typeText
gi.citation.endPage139
gi.citation.startPage119
gi.citations.count8
gi.citations.elementIsto Huvila (2022): Improving the usefulness of research data with better paradata, In: Open Information Science 1(6), doi:10.1515/opis-2022-0129
gi.citations.elementJames R. Eagan (2017): Grab ‘n’ Drop: User Configurable Toolglasses, In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67687-6_21
gi.citations.elementMary Beth Kery, Marissa Radensky, Mahima Arya, Bonnie E. John, Brad A. Myers (2018): The Story in the Notebook, In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doi:10.1145/3173574.3173748
gi.citations.elementGerard Oleksik, Natasa Milic-Frayling, Rachel Jones (2014): Study of electronic lab notebook design and practices that emerged in a collaborative scientific environment, In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, doi:10.1145/2531602.2531709
gi.citations.elementPhilipp M. Scholl, Matthias Wille, Kristof Van Laerhoven (2015): Wearables in the wet lab, In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, doi:10.1145/2750858.2807547
gi.citations.elementDunja Mladenic (2021): Artificial Intelligence ( <scp>AI</scp> ) Transforming Laboratories, In: Digital Transformation of the Laboratory, doi:10.1002/9783527825042.ch21
gi.citations.elementDena Tahvildari (2015): Semantic Support for Recording Laboratory Experimental Metadata: A Study in Food Chemistry, In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18818-8_51
gi.citations.elementDhaval Vyas, Hinal Vyas, Maria A. Woodruff (2017): Everyday Creative Uses of Smartphone Images in Biomedical Engineering Laboratories, In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67744-6_22
gi.conference.dateMay, 18-21, 2010
gi.conference.locationAix-en-Provence
gi.conference.sessiontitleFull Papers

Files

Original bundle

1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
00491.pdf
Size:
687.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: