Effects of Comment Curation and Opposition on Coherence in Online Policy Discussion

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMcInnis, Brian
dc.contributor.authorCosley, Dan
dc.contributor.authorBaumer, Eric
dc.contributor.authorLeshed, Gilly
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-17T22:48:57Z
dc.date.available2023-03-17T22:48:57Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractPublic concern related to a policy may span a range of topics. As a result, policy discussions struggle to deeply examine any one topic before moving to the next. In policy deliberation research, this is referred to as a problem of topical coherence. In an experiment, we curated the comments in a policy discussion to prioritize arguments for or against a policy proposal, and examined how this curation and participants' initial positions of support or opposition to the policy affected the coherence of their contributions to existing topics. We found an asymmetric interaction between participants' initial positions and comment curation: participants with different initial positions had unequal reactions to curation that foregrounded comments with which they disagreed. This asymmetry implies that the factors underlying coherence are more nuanced than prioritizing participants' agreement or disagreement. We discuss how this finding relates to curating for coherent disagreement, and for curation more generally in deliberative processes.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/3148330.3148348
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/4588
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
dc.titleEffects of Comment Curation and Opposition on Coherence in Online Policy Discussionen
dc.typeText/Conference Paper
gi.citation.startPage347–358
gi.conference.locationSanibel Island, Florida, USA

Files

Collections

GROUP 2018