Overcoming social awareness in computer-supported groups

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorWeisband, Suzanne
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-06T00:42:35Z
dc.date.available2020-06-06T00:42:35Z
dc.date.issued1993
dc.date.issued1993
dc.description.abstractWe examined status effects in face-to-face and computer-mediated three-person groups. Our expectation that low status members in computer-mediated group discussions would participate more equally, and have more influence over decisions, than their counterparts in face-to-face groups was not confirmed. The results suggest that knowledge of status differences and labels were used to form cognitive impressions of other group members. It seems that when group members are aware of the status characteristics of the group, social cues were magnified rather than redüced. Implications of these findings for mixed status cooperative work groups and for the design of computer communication systems are discussed.de
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/BF00805695
dc.identifier.pissn1573-7551
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00805695
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3438
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 2, No. 4
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
dc.subjectAnonymity
dc.subjectComputer-mediated communication
dc.subjectCSCW
dc.subjectGDSS
dc.subjectSocial cues
dc.subjectStatus
dc.titleOvercoming social awareness in computer-supported groupsde
dc.typeText/Journal Article
gi.citation.endPage297
gi.citation.startPage285
gi.citations.count19
gi.citations.elementRobert J. McQueen, Karen Rayner, Ned Kock (1999): Contribution by participants in face‐to‐face business meetings: Implications for collaborative technology, In: Journal of Systems and Information Technology 1(3), doi:10.1108/13287269980000742
gi.citations.elementVan Thanh Nguyen, Le Thai Phong, Nguyen Thi Khanh Chi (2023): The impact of AI chatbots on customer trust: an empirical investigation in the hotel industry, In: Consumer Behavior in Tourism and Hospitality 3(18), doi:10.1108/cbth-06-2022-0131
gi.citations.elementAlison J. Bianchi, Soong Moon Kang, Daniel Stewart (2012): The Organizational Selection of Status Characteristics: Status Evaluations in an Open Source Community, In: Organization Science 2(23), doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0580
gi.citations.elementVitaly Dubrovsky, Danial Clapper, Monali Ullal (1994): The effects of a ?distinct window? screen design on computer-mediated group decision making, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1(4), doi:10.1007/bf00823362
gi.citations.elementSuzanne Weisband (1997): The cutting edge, In: ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 1(27), doi:10.1145/382069.382688
gi.citations.elementJ. Fjerrnestad, S.R. Hiltz (2000): Experimental studies of group decision support systems: an assessment of variables studied and methodology, In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, doi:10.1109/hicss.1997.665461
gi.citations.elementFurio Belgiorno, Ilaria Manno, Giuseppina Palmieri, Vittorio Scarano (2010): Free-Riding in Collaborative Diagrams Drawing, In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_37
gi.citations.elementJ. Guegan, E. Michinov (2011): Communication via Internet et dynamiques identitaires : une analyse psychosociale, In: Psychologie Française 4(56), doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2011.09.001
gi.citations.elementJ.F. George, J.R. Carlson (2000): Group support systems and deceptive communication, In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers, doi:10.1109/hicss.1999.772722
gi.citations.elementP.B. Lowry, J.F. Nunamaker (2000): Synchronous, distributed collaborative writing for policy agenda setting using Collaboratus, an Internet-based collaboration tool, In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, doi:10.1109/hicss.2002.993860
gi.citations.elementR.J. Ocker (2007): A Balancing Act: The Interplay of Status Effects on Dominance in Virtual Teams, In: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 3(50), doi:10.1109/tpc.2007.902656
gi.citations.elementKimberly M. Christopherson (2007): The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: “On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Dog”, In: Computers in Human Behavior 6(23), doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.09.001
gi.citations.elementNed Kock (2004): The Psychobiological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution, In: Organization Science 3(15), doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0071
gi.citations.elementTom Postmes, Russell Spears (2002): Behavior Online: Does Anonymous Computer Communication Reduce Gender Inequality?, In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 8(28), doi:10.1177/01461672022811006
gi.citations.elementRussell Haines, Jill Hough, Lan Cao, Douglas Haines (2012): Anonymity in Computer-Mediated Communication: More Contrarian Ideas with Less Influence, In: Group Decision and Negotiation 4(23), doi:10.1007/s10726-012-9318-2
gi.citations.elementErin M. Sumner, Artemio Ramirez (2017): Social Information Processing Theory and Hyperpersonal Perspective, In: The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects, doi:10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0090
gi.citations.elementJOSEPH B. WALTHER (1996): Computer-Mediated Communication, In: Communication Research 1(23), doi:10.1177/009365096023001001
gi.citations.elementAri Schlesinger, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Christina A. Masden, Amy S. Bruckman, W. Keith Edwards, Rebecca E. Grinter (2017): Situated Anonymity, In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doi:10.1145/3025453.3025682
gi.citations.elementN. Kock (2005): Media Richness or Media Naturalness? The Evolution of Our Biological Communication Apparatus and Its Influence on Our Behavior Toward E-Communication Tools, In: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 2(48), doi:10.1109/tpc.2005.849649

Files

Collections

JCSCW Vol. 02 (1993)