Sharrock and Button ... and Much Ado about Nothing
Loading...
Fulltext URI
Document type
Text/Journal Article
Additional Information
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Abstract
The paper discusses Sharrock's and Button's criticism of our attempt to use Habermas' communicative action theory to analyze group work platforms. We demonstrate that they misconstrue our goals of the paper, misinterpret our analysis of Habermas' action types, and misunderstand the concept of critical science. At the end we question the usefulness of these types of debates in furthering CSCW research.
Description
Keywords
critical theory, CSCW, deconstruction, ideal speech situation, social action theory
Citation
URI
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Load citations
Please note: Providing information about citations is only possible thanks to to the open metadata APIs provided by crossref.org and opencitations.net. These lists may be incomplete due to unavailable citation data.