Sharrock and Button ... and Much Ado about Nothing

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLyytinen, Kalle
dc.contributor.authorNgwenyama, Ojelanki
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-06T06:52:53Z
dc.date.available2020-06-06T06:52:53Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.description.abstractThe paper discusses Sharrock's and Button's criticism of our attempt to use Habermas' communicative action theory to analyze group work platforms. We demonstrate that they misconstrue our goals of the paper, misinterpret our analysis of Habermas' action types, and misunderstand the concept of critical science. At the end we question the usefulness of these types of debates in furthering CSCW research.de
dc.identifier.doi10.1023/A:1008720609782
dc.identifier.pissn1573-7551
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008720609782
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3541
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 8, No. 3
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
dc.subjectcritical theory
dc.subjectCSCW
dc.subjectdeconstruction
dc.subjectideal speech situation
dc.subjectsocial action theory
dc.titleSharrock and Button ... and Much Ado about Nothingde
dc.typeText/Journal Article
gi.citation.endPage293
gi.citation.startPage285

Files

Collections

JCSCW Vol. 08 (1999)