Journal Article

Interaction process in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Fulltext URI

Document type

Text/Journal Article

Additional Information

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative description of interactions in computer-mediated (CMC) and face-to-face (FTF) groups. For each of six weeks 16 CMC and 14 FTF groups of students collaborated on group essay assignments. We coded all verbal messages during these essay tasks. We explored four questions: 1.) Do CMC and FTF groups differ in the frequency of interaction acts, overall and within interaction categories?; 2.) If so, which interaction categories are used more by CMC and which by FTF groups?; 3.) Do these patterns of interaction activity vary over time?; 4.) Are there systematic differences in interaction patterns over time between media? Results showed that there were substantial differences between CMC and FTF groups in both the amount and type of interaction for each of four main categories of interaction. There were substantial over-time effects, collapsed across media, for several of the categories of behavior, but there were no significant differences in the way CMC and FTF groups changed over time. Although there was extensive variation among groups within a given medium, we did find some consistent patterns of behavior for groups within each medium, some of them distinctive for the medium. Although we offer evidence for differences in interaction processes of FTF and CMC groups, we note that the conclusions one makes depends upon one's perspective about the purpose of groups.

Description

Lebie, Linda; Rhoades, Jonathan A.; Mcgrath, Joseph E. (1995): Interaction process in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 4, No. 2-3. DOI: 10.1007/BF00749744. Springer. PISSN: 1573-7551

Keywords

Computer-mediated communication, computer-supported collaborative work, group interaction patterns, group process data, interaction processes, longitudinal study

Citation

URI

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By


Number of citations to item: 58

  • Nadira Saab, Wouter R. van Joolingen, Bernadette H. A. M. van Hout‐Wolters (2005): Communication in collaborative discovery learning, In: British Journal of Educational Psychology 4(75), doi:10.1348/000709905x42905
  • Eva M. Lira, Pilar Ripoll, José M. Peiró, Ana M. Zornoza (2008): The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in the Relationship Between Group Effectiveness and Group Potency, In: Small Group Research 6(39), doi:10.1177/1046496408323481
  • Angela Zavaleta Bernuy, Naaz Sibia, Pan Chen, Jessica Jia-Ni Xu, Elexandra Tran, Runlong Ye, Viktoria Pammer-Schindler, Andrew Petersen, Joseph Jay Williams, Michael Liut (2024): Does the Medium Matter? An Exploration of Voice-Interaction for Self-Explanations, In: Designing Interactive Systems Conference, doi:10.1145/3643834.3661596
  • Pei-Chen Sun, Hsing Kenny Cheng, Tung-Chin Lin, Feng-Sheng Wang (2008): A design to promote group learning in e-learning: Experiences from the field, In: Computers & Education 3(50), doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.07.008
  • Michael Koch, Martin R. Fischer, Andrea Tipold, Jan P. Ehlers (2012): Can Online Conference Systems Improve Veterinary Education? A Study about the Capability of Online Conferencing and its Acceptance, In: Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 3(39), doi:10.3138/jvme.0911-097r
  • Haibin Zhu, Ming Hou, Wenqian Shang (2010): Human-computer interaction with roles: A cognitive method for interaction, In: 9th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI'10), doi:10.1109/coginf.2010.5599701
  • Jorge Peña, Jeffrey T. Hancock (2006): An Analysis of Socioemotional and Task Communication in Online Multiplayer Video Games, In: Communication Research 1(33), doi:10.1177/0093650205283103
  • (2009): Influencing Individual Perceptions of Deep Level Diversity in Virtual Learning Teams (VLT), In: 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, doi:10.1109/hicss.2009.252
  • Gamze Yilmaz (2015): What You Do and How You Speak Matter, In: Journal of Language and Social Psychology 1(35), doi:10.1177/0261927x15575772
  • Robert J. McQueen, Karen Rayner, Ned Kock (1999): Contribution by participants in face‐to‐face business meetings: Implications for collaborative technology, In: Journal of Systems and Information Technology 1(3), doi:10.1108/13287269980000742
  • Kara L Orvis, Robert A Wisher, Curtis J Bonk, Tatana M Olson (2002): Communication patterns during synchronous Web-based military training in problem solving, In: Computers in Human Behavior 6(18), doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(02)00018-3
  • Deanna M. Kennedy, Ralitza R. Vozdolska, Sara A. McComb (2010): Team Decision Making in Computer‐Supported Cooperative Work: How Initial Computer‐Mediated or Face‐to‐Face Meetings Set the Stage for Later Outcomes*, In: Decision Sciences 4(41), doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00293.x
  • Joseph E. McGrath, T. William Altermatt (2001): Observation and Analysis of Group Interaction Over Time: some Methodological and Strategic Choicess, In: Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes, doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch22
  • Patricia J. Slagter van Tryon, M.J. Bishop (2009): Theoretical foundations for enhancing social connectedness in online learning environments, In: Distance Education 3(30), doi:10.1080/01587910903236312
  • Jolanta Aritz, Robyn Walker, Peter W. Cardon (2017): Media Use in Virtual Teams of Varying Levels of Coordination, In: Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 2(81), doi:10.1177/2329490617723114
  • Mark Mortensen, Tsedal Neeley (2009): Being There: Firsthand Experience and Perceived Reflected Knowledge in Engendering Trust in Global Collaboration, In: SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:10.2139/ssrn.1395732
  • Essi Vuopala, Pirkko Hyvönen, Sanna Järvelä (2015): Interaction forms in successful collaborative learning in virtual learning environments, In: Active Learning in Higher Education 1(17), doi:10.1177/1469787415616730
  • Luis L. Martins, Lucy L. Gilson, M. Travis Maynard (2004): Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here?, In: Journal of Management 6(30), doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002
  • Eric M. Stark, Paul E. Bierly III (2009): An analysis of predictors of team satisfaction in product development teams with differing levels of virtualness, In: R&D Management 5(39), doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00571.x
  • Shiou-Wen Yeh, Jia-Jiunn Lo, Jeng-Jia Huang (2011): Scaffolding collaborative technical writing with procedural facilitation and synchronous discussion, In: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3(6), doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9117-9
  • Jörg Wittwer, Matthias Nückles, Alexander Renkl (2007): Is underestimation less detrimental than overestimation? The impact of experts’ beliefs about a layperson’s knowledge on learning and question asking, In: Instructional Science 1(36), doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9021-x
  • Isabell M. Welpe, Andranik Tumasjan, Maria Strobel (2010): Construal Level Theory - Eine Theorie für die Grenzenlose Unternehmung? (Construal Level Theory - A Theory for the Boundaryless Organization?), In: SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:10.2139/ssrn.1832206
  • Leif Jarle Gressgård (2011): Virtual team collaboration and innovation in organizations, In: Team Performance Management: An International Journal 1/2(17), doi:10.1108/13527591111114738
  • Lisa Collins Tidwell, Joseph B. Walther (2002): Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting to Know One Another a Bit at a Time, In: Human Communication Research 3(28), doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x
  • Andrew C. High, Denise Haunani Solomon (2014): Communication Channel, Sex, and the Immediate and Longitudinal Outcomes of Verbal Person-centered Support, In: Communication Monographs 4(81), doi:10.1080/03637751.2014.933245
  • Nadira Saab, Wouter R. van Joolingen, Bernadette H. A. M. van Hout-Wolters (2006): Supporting Communication in a Collaborative Discovery Learning Environment: the Effect of Instruction, In: Instructional Science 1(35), doi:10.1007/s11251-006-9003-4
  • Catherine Durnell Cramton (2001): The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration, In: Organization Science 3(12), doi:10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098
  • Joseph E. Mcgrath, Holly Arrow (1996): Introduction: The JEMCO-2 Study of time, technology, and groups, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2-3(4), doi:10.1007/bf00749743
  • J.B. Walther, M. Boos, K.J. Jonas (2000): Misattribution and attributional redirection in distributed virtual groups, In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, doi:10.1109/hicss.2002.994427
  • T Postmes, R Spears, M Lea (2000): The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication, In: Human Communication Research 3(26), doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00761.x
  • Haibin Zhu, Ming Hou (2011): Role-Based Human-Computer Interactions, In: International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence 2(5), doi:10.4018/jcini.2011040103
  • E. M. Lira, P. Ripoll, J. M. Peiró, A. M. Zornoza (2013): The role of information and communication technologies in the relationship between group potency and group maintenance outcomes: a longitudinal study, In: Behaviour & Information Technology 2(32), doi:10.1080/0144929x.2011.630421
  • Jennifer L. Berdahl, Kellina M. Craig (1996): Equality of participation and influence in groups: The effects of communication medium and sex composition, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2-3(4), doi:10.1007/bf00749746
  • Haibin Zhu, Ming Hou (2000): Role-Based Human-Computer Interactions, In: Cognitive Informatics for Revealing Human Cognition, doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2476-4.ch003
  • Yla R. Tausczik, James W. Pennebaker (2013): Improving teamwork using real-time language feedback, In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doi:10.1145/2470654.2470720
  • Lukas Meub, Till Proeger (2017): The impact of communication regimes and cognitive abilities on group rationality: Experimental evidence, In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.02.010
  • Ana Zornoza, Pilar Ripoll, José M. Peiró (2002): Conflict Management in Groups that Work in Two Different Communication Contexts, In: Small Group Research 5(33), doi:10.1177/104649602237167
  • Sara McComb, Deanna Kennedy, Rebecca Perryman, Norman Warner, Michael Letsky (2010): Temporal Patterns of Mental Model Convergence: Implications for Distributed Teams Interacting in Electronic Collaboration Spaces, In: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2(52), doi:10.1177/0018720810370458
  • Eva M. Lira, Pilar Ripoll, José M. Peiró, Pilar González (2007): The roles of group potency and information and communication technologies in the relationship between task conflict and team effectiveness: A longitudinal study, In: Computers in Human Behavior 6(23), doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.06.004
  • Isabell M. Welpe, Andranik Tumasjan, Maria Strobel (2010): Construal Level Theory–Eine Theorie für die grenzenlose Unternehmung?, In: Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung S62(62), doi:10.1007/bf03373748
  • Bradley L. Kirkman, Cristina B. Gibson, Kwanghyun Kim (2012): Across Borders and Technologies: Advancements in Virtual Teams Research, In: The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, Volume 2, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928286.013.0025
  • Jonathan A. Rhoades, Kathleen M. O'Connor (1996): Affect in computer-mediated and face-to-face work groups: The construction and testing of a general model, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2-3(4), doi:10.1007/bf00749747
  • Joseph B. Walther, Ulla Bunz (2005): The Rules of Virtual Groups: Trust, Liking, and Performance in Computer-Mediated Communication, In: Journal of Communication 4(55), doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03025.x
  • Bryan Smith, Marı́a José Alvarez-Torres, Yong Zhao (2003): Features of CMC technologies and their impact on language learners’ online interaction, In: Computers in Human Behavior 6(19), doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(03)00011-6
  • Joseph E. McGrath, Jennifer L. Berdahl (2002): Groups, Technology, and Time, In: Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues, doi:10.1007/0-306-47144-2_10
  • Nadira Saab, Wouter R. van Joolingen, B.H.A.M. van Hout‐Wolters (2009): The relation of learners’ motivation with the process of collaborative scientific discovery learning, In: Educational Studies 2(35), doi:10.1080/03055690802470357
  • Lucio Biggiero (2008): A Typology of Media Users in a Multinational Corporation, In: SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:10.2139/ssrn.1222302
  • Paul E. Bierly, Eric M. Stark, Eric H. Kessler (2009): The Moderating Effects of Virtuality on the Antecedents and Outcome of NPD Team Trust, In: Journal of Product Innovation Management 5(26), doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00680.x
  • Zixing Shen, Kalle Lyytinen, Youngjin Yoo (2015): Time and information technology in teams: a review of empirical research and future research directions, In: European Journal of Information Systems 5(24), doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.8
  • J. Richard Hackman, Nancy Katz (2010): Group Behavior and Performance, In: Handbook of Social Psychology, doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002032
  • Angela Zavaleta Bernuy, Naaz Sibia, Pan Chen, Chloe Huang, Andrew Petersen, Joseph Jay Williams, Michael Liut (2023): VoiceEx: Voice Submission System for Interventions in Education, In: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2, doi:10.1145/3587103.3595284
  • Yuanyuan Feng, Katie Li, Azin Semsar, Hannah McGowan, Jacqueline Mun, H. Reza Zahiri, Ivan George, Adrian Park, Andrea Kleinsmith, Helena M. Mentis (2019): Communication Cost of Single-user Gesturing Tool in Laparoscopic Surgical Training, In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doi:10.1145/3290605.3300841
  • J. Fjerrnestad, S.R. Hiltz (2000): Experimental studies of group decision support systems: an assessment of variables studied and methodology, In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, doi:10.1109/hicss.1997.665461
  • Moussa Tankari (2016): Integration of Multiple Web 2.0 Tools and Student Task Completion in Two Educational Technology Classes, In: Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9680-8.ch010
  • Jeannette McDonald, Chère Campbell Gibson (1998): Interpersonal dynamics and group development in computer conferencing, In: American Journal of Distance Education 1(12), doi:10.1080/08923649809526980
  • Irina Falls, Victor Bahhouth, Chiuchu Melody Chuang, Jocelyne Bahhouth (2014): Factors Influencing Students’ Perceptions of Online Teamwork, In: Sage Open 1(4), doi:10.1177/2158244014525415
  • Daphna Shwarts-Asher, Niv Ahituv, Dalia Etzion (2009): Computer-Mediated Group Interaction Processes, In: 2009 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, doi:10.1109/cisis.2009.124
  • Michel J. J. Handgraaf, Kerry F. Milch, Kirstin C. Appelt, Philip Schuette, Nicole A. Yoskowitz, Elke U. Weber (2012): Web-conferencing as a viable method for group decision research, In: Judgment and Decision Making 5(7), doi:10.1017/s1930297500006379
Please note: Providing information about citations is only possible thanks to to the open metadata APIs provided by crossref.org and opencitations.net. These lists may be incomplete due to unavailable citation data.source: opencitations.net, crossref.org