Journal Article

Intermediary Objects as a Means to Foster Co-operation in Engineering Design

Thumbnail Image

Fulltext URI

Document type

Text/Journal Article

Additional Information

Date

2003, 2003

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Source

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 12, No. 2

Publisher

Springer

Abstract

In this paper we argue that co-operation is aparticular way to co-ordinate an industrialactivity and that it is particularly suited tocollaborative design activity. Through a welldocumented case study of the development of afront truck axle, we point out several keyfeatures of co-operation in an industrialsetting. We particularly pay attention to theinterfaces between the actors involved in thecollaborative process. We observed thepre-eminence of the representations and theobjects created, manipulated, and finally weclaim that they support knowledge creation andtherefore allow the development of a commonunderstanding of the design situation (i.e. theproblem and the solution). We propose theconcept of ``intermediary object'' as aconceptual framework for the involvement ofobjects in the design process. We demonstratethe power of this concept in the analysis andmodelling of particular design situations andin the development of specific objects thatfoster co-operation in real design situations.

Description

Boujut, Jean-François; Blanco, Eric (2003): Intermediary Objects as a Means to Foster Co-operation in Engineering Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 12, No. 2. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023980212097. Springer. PISSN: 1573-7551. pp. 205-219

Keywords

collaborative design, computer aided design, concurrent engineering, empirical studies, intermediary objects

Citation

DOI

10.1023/A:1023980212097

URI

URI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023980212097
 https://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3634

Collections

JCSCW Vol. 12 (2003)

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Number of citations to item: 126

  • Claudia Eckert, Alan Blackwell, Martin Stacey, Christopher Earl, Luke Church (2012): Sketching across design domains: Roles and formalities, In: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 3(26), doi:10.1017/s0890060412000133
  • Myriam Lewkowicz, Fons Wijnhoven, Anca Draghici (2000): Misunderstandings in Global Virtual Engineering Teams: Definitions, Causes, and Guidelines for Knowledge Sharing and Interaction, In: Methods and Tools for Effective Knowledge Life-Cycle-Management, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78431-9_8
  • Reijo Miettinen, Sami Paavola (2016): Reconceptualizing object construction: the dynamics of Building Information Modelling in construction design, In: Information Systems Journal 3(28), doi:10.1111/isj.12125
  • Christer W. Elverum, Torgeir Welo (2015): On the use of directional and incremental prototyping in the development of high novelty products: Two case studies in the automotive industry, In: Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.09.003
  • Ju Yeon Jung, Tom Steinberger, John L. King, Mark S. Ackerman (2021): Negotiating Repairedness: How Artifacts Under Repair Become Contingently Stabilized, In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction CSCW2(5), doi:10.1145/3476069
  • Anja M. Maier, Claudia M. Eckert, P. John Clarkson (2021): Factors influencing communication in collaborative design, In: Journal of Engineering Design 12(32), doi:10.1080/09544828.2021.1954146
  • I. Bisson, M. Mahdjoub, M. Zare, J.-B. Bluntzer, J.-C. Sagot, F. Goutaudier, F. Ravier (2022): Proposal of a Conceptual Framework for Collaborative Design of Immersive Professional Training: Application to the Textile Industry, In: Proceedings of the Design Society, doi:10.1017/pds.2022.12
  • Lene Bjerg Hall-Andersen, Ole Broberg (2014): Integrating ergonomics into engineering design: The role of objects, In: Applied Ergonomics 3(45), doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.09.002
  • Charlotte P. Lee (2007): Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3(16), doi:10.1007/s10606-007-9044-5
  • Maria Ianeva, Patrick Chotel, Frédérique Miriel (2015): Learnings from Workplace User-Centered Design, In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2015, doi:10.1145/2788412.2788426
  • Eric Blanco, Marie-Anne Le Dain (2007): ICT System Requirements in Collaborative Design with Suppliers, In: Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering II, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6761-7_13
  • Julien Nelson (2018): Modelling the Creative Process in Design: A Socio-cognitive Approach, In: The Creative Process, doi:10.1057/978-1-137-50563-7_8
  • Mark S. Ackerman, Juri Dachtera, Volkmar Pipek, Volker Wulf (2013): Sharing Knowledge and Expertise: The CSCW View of Knowledge Management, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 4-6(22), doi:10.1007/s10606-013-9192-8
  • A. Gabriel, M. Camargo, D. Monticolo, M. Bourgault (2014): Process modelling for a creative problem solving support system, In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Innovative Design and Manufacturing (ICIDM), doi:10.1109/idam.2014.6912691
  • Erica de Vries, Cédric Masclet (2013): A framework for the study of external representations in collaborative design settings, In: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 1(71), doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.07.005
  • Wolff-Michael Roth, Alfredo Jornet (2017): From Object-Oriented to Fluid Ontology: a Case Study of the Materiality of Design Work in Agile Software Development, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1(27), doi:10.1007/s10606-017-9297-6
  • Andrea Tucker, Cédric Fluckiger, Thierry Gidel (2024): Apprendre à travailler ensemble : influences de l’espace de travail numérique sur l’engagement dans la collaboration, In: Recherches en éducation, doi:10.4000/ree.12444
  • Hamish Harvey, Roger Peppé, Jim Hall (2008): Reframe: A software system supporting flood risk analysis, In: International Journal of River Basin Management 2(6), doi:10.1080/15715124.2008.9635345
  • Alfredo Jornet, Rolf Steier (2015): The Matter of Space: Bodily Performances and the Emergence of Boundary Objects During Multidisciplinary Design Meetings, In: Mind, Culture, and Activity 2(22), doi:10.1080/10749039.2015.1024794
  • CHRISTIAN JOHANSSON (2014): MANAGING UNCERTAINTY AND AMBIGUITY IN GATES: DECISION MAKING IN AEROSPACE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT, In: International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 02(11), doi:10.1142/s0219877014500126
  • Dorian Reunkrilerk, Estelle Berger (2021): Médiation au design avec des ingénieurs : le tact comme posture, In: Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication, doi:10.4000/rfsic.12138
  • Ethan C. Hilton, Kimberly G. Talley, Shaunna F. Smith, Robert L. Nagel, Julie S. Linsey (2020): Report on Engineering Design Self-Efficacy and Demographics of Makerspace Participants Across Three Universities, In: Journal of Mechanical Design 10(142), doi:10.1115/1.4046649
  • Deana D. Pennington (2010): The Dynamics of Material Artifacts in Collaborative Research Teams, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2(19), doi:10.1007/s10606-010-9108-9
  • Signe Pedersen, Christian Clausen (2019): Staging Co-Design for a Circular Economy, In: Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design 1(1), doi:10.1017/dsi.2019.344
  • James A. Gopsill, Hamish C. McAlpine, Ben J. Hicks (2013): A Social Media framework to support Engineering Design Communication, In: Advanced Engineering Informatics 4(27), doi:10.1016/j.aei.2013.07.002
  • Olivia Borgue, Massimo Panarotto, Ola Isaksson (2022): Reducing design uncertainty through model-based collaborative design methods when introducing new technologies: A Solomon four-groups empirical design study, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2101538/v1
  • Dominique Vinck (2009): De l’objet intermédiaire à l’objet-frontière, In: Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances 1(3), doi:10.3917/rac.006.0051
  • Marianne Kinnula, Netta Iivari, Leena Kuure, Tonja Molin-Juustila (2023): Educational Participatory Design in the Crossroads of Histories and Practices – Aiming for Digital Transformation in Language Pedagogy, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 4(32), doi:10.1007/s10606-023-09473-8
  • Thierry Gidel, Gael Buet, Dominique Millet (2014): Synchronization of Innovation and Vehicle Projects: Proposal of a Management Tool at Renault SAS, In: Project Management Journal 3(45), doi:10.1002/pmj.21429
  • Will Sutherland, Drew Paine, Charlotte P. Lee (2024): ‘The Cloud is Not Not IT’: Ecological Change in Research Computing in the Cloud, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 4(33), doi:10.1007/s10606-024-09490-1
  • Claudia Eckert, Martin Stacey, Christopher Earl (2013): Formality in design communication, In: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 2(27), doi:10.1017/s0890060413000073
  • Eric Blanco, Franck Pourroy, Serap Arikoglu (2014): Role of Personas and Scenarios in Creating Shared Understanding of Functional Requirements: An Empirical Study, In: Design Computing and Cognition '12, doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_4
  • Jennifer Scoles (2018): Researching ‘messy objects’: how can boundary objects strengthen the analytical pursuit of an actor-network theory study?, In: Studies in Continuing Education 3(40), doi:10.1080/0158037x.2018.1456416
  • Ole Broberg, Vibeke Andersen, Rikke Seim (2011): Participatory ergonomics in design processes: The role of boundary objects, In: Applied Ergonomics 3(42), doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.006
  • Mahenina Remiel FENO, Patrick MARTIN, Bruno DAILLE-LEFEVRE, Alain ETIENNE, Jacques MARSOT, Ali SIADAT (2016): Safety of Manufacturing Equipment: Methodology Based on a Work Situation Model and Need Functional Analysis, In: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_115
  • Simone Nyholm Andersen, Ole Broberg (2021): Transfer of ergonomics knowledge from participatory simulation events into hospital design projects, In: Work 2(68), doi:10.3233/wor-203379
  • Hanen Kooli-Chaabane, Vincent Boly, Bernard Yannou (2014): Monitoring of technology transfer projects in industrial clusters, In: Journal of Innovation Economics & Management 1(n°13), doi:10.3917/jie.013.0073
  • Christiane Rau, Anne-Katrin Neyer, Kathrin M. Möslein (2012): Innovation practices and their boundary-crossing mechanisms: a review and proposals for the future, In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2(24), doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.647647
  • Bill Doolin, Laurie McLeod (2012): Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development, In: European Journal of Information Systems 5(21), doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.20
  • Demosthenes Akoumianakis, Giannis Milolidakis, Anargyros Akrivos, Zacharias Panteris, Giorgos Ktistakis (2010): Clinical Practice Guideline Management Information Systems: Cancer Guidelines as Boundary Spanning Tranformable Objects of Practice, In: 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, doi:10.1109/incos.2010.27
  • Signe Pedersen, Marcel L. A. M. Bogers, Christian Clausen (2022): Navigating collaborative open innovation projects: Staging negotiations of actors' concerns, In: Creativity and Innovation Management 2(31), doi:10.1111/caim.12492
  • Maria Adriana Neroni, Alfred Oti, Nathan Crilly (2021): Virtual Reality design-build-test games with physics simulation: opportunities for researching design cognition, In: International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 3(9), doi:10.1080/21650349.2021.1929500
  • Floriane Laverne, Raphael Marquardt, Frédéric Segonds, Imade Koutiri, Nicolas Perry (2019): Improving resources consumption of additive manufacturing use during early design stages: a case study, In: International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 6(12), doi:10.1080/19397038.2019.1620897
  • Céline Verchère, Emmanuel Anjembe (2010): De la difficulté de fabriquer des objets-frontières, In: Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances 1(4), doi:10.3917/rac.009.0036
  • Maxence Arnould, Manon Enjolras, Mauricio Camargo (2022): Designing a group decision-making tool under Living Lab project mode: The case of ConsensUs, In: 2022 IEEE 28th International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) & 31st International Association For Management of Technology (IAMOT) Joint Conference, doi:10.1109/ice/itmc-iamot55089.2022.10033130
  • Vimal Viswanathan, Julie Linsey (2020): Designing with examples: a study on the role of familiarity, warnings and physical modelling, In: Journal of Engineering Design 11-12(31), doi:10.1080/09544828.2020.1851356
  • Daniela Retelny, Pamela Hinds (2016): Embedding Intentions in Drawings, In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, doi:10.1145/2818048.2819932
  • Paraskeva Wlazlak, Yvonne Eriksson, Glenn Johansson, Peter Ahlin (2019): Visual representations for communication in geographically distributed new product development projects, In: Journal of Engineering Design 8-9(30), doi:10.1080/09544828.2019.1661362
  • Annie Gentès (2022): Pour une théorie « média-centrée » du design, In: Approches Théoriques en Information-Communication (ATIC) 1(N° 4), doi:10.3917/atic.004.0051
  • Demosthenes Akoumianakis, Giannis Milolidakis, Dimitrios Stefanakis, Anargyros Akrivos, George Vellis, Dimitrios Kotsalis, Anargyros Plemenos, Nikolaos Vidakis (2009): Virtual Operations in Common Information Spaces: Boundary Objects and Practices, In: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04568-4_22
  • Dominique Vinck (2011): Taking intermediary objects and equipping work into account in the study of engineering practices, In: Engineering Studies 1(3), doi:10.1080/19378629.2010.547989
  • Nathalie Skiba, Laurent Dupont, Laure Morel, Claudine Guidat (2012): A space for innovation process acceleration, supporting collaborative citizens workshops, In: 2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, doi:10.1109/ice.2012.6297646
  • Dimitra Chasanidou (2018): Design for Motivation: Evaluation of a Design Tool, In: Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 1(2), doi:10.3390/mti2010006
  • (2014): From use analysis to the design of artifacts: The development of instruments, In: Constructive Ergonomics, doi:10.1201/b17456-16
  • Ole Broberg, Rikke Seim, Vibeke Andersen (2010): Collaborative design of workplaces, In: Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics Series, doi:10.1201/ebk1439835074-c6
  • Karin André, C. Anna Jonsson (2013): Science-practice interactions linked to climate adaptation in two contexts: municipal planning and forestry in Sweden, In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2(58), doi:10.1080/09640568.2013.854717
  • Jean-François Bassereau, Régine Charvet Pello, Jenny Faucheu, David Delafosse (2015): Les objets intermédiaires de conception / design, instruments d’une recherche par le design, In: Sciences du Design 2(n° 2), doi:10.3917/sdd.002.0048
  • Ole Broberg, Rikke Seim, Vibeke Andersen (2010): Collaborative Design of Workplaces: The Role of Boundary Objects, In: Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics Series, doi:10.1201/ebk1439835074-7
  • Jan Arild Dolonen, Sten Ludvigsen (2013): Analysing design suggestions and use of resources in co-design of educational software: A case study, In: CoDesign 4(9), doi:10.1080/15710882.2013.853086
  • (2016): Bibliography, In: Fab Labs, doi:10.1002/9781119318392.biblio
  • Anne-Lise Rias, Frédéric Segonds, Carole Bouchard, Stéphane Abed (2017): Towards additive manufacturing of intermediate objects (AMIO) for concepts generation, In: International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 2(11), doi:10.1007/s12008-017-0369-0
  • Christelle Casse (2018): Event Cross-Simulation: A Tool for Structuring Debates on Work, Enhancing Collective Learning and Improving Safety Management, In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96080-7_31
  • Ida Larsen-Ledet, Henrik Korsgaard (2019): Territorial Functioning in Collaborative Writing, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3-4(28), doi:10.1007/s10606-019-09359-8
  • Mateus Pereira Abraçado, Francisco José de Castro Moura Duarte, Pascal Béguin (2021): Classes and Dimensions of Task Microprojects: A Case Study on Cargo Handling, In: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74602-5_1
  • Mickaël David, Frantz Rowe (2016): What does PLMS (product lifecycle management systems) manage: Data or documents? Complementarity and contingency for SMEs, In: Computers in Industry, doi:10.1016/j.compind.2015.05.005
  • Jorge Maya, Ever Patiño Mazo (2020): Propiedades de las representaciones en diseño : una exploración interdisciplinaria de su rol funcional., In: Kepes 21(17), doi:10.17151/kepes.2020.17.21.2
  • Philip Cash, Anja Maier (2016): Prototyping with your hands: the many roles of gesture in the communication of design concepts, In: Journal of Engineering Design 1-3(27), doi:10.1080/09544828.2015.1126702
  • Vimal Viswanathan, Julie Linsey (2014): Spanning the complexity chasm: A research approach to move from simple to complex engineering systems, In: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 4(28), doi:10.1017/s0890060414000535
  • Vimal K. Viswanathan, Julie S. Linsey (2013): Role of Sunk Cost in Engineering Idea Generation: An Experimental Investigation, In: Journal of Mechanical Design 12(135), doi:10.1115/1.4025290
  • Nicholas de Galvez, Jacques Marsot, Patrick Martin, Ali Siadat, Alain Etienne (2016): Proposition of an Approach Applicable During the Design Process of Working Equipment to Identify Potential Hazards for Workers, In: Procedia CIRP, doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.080
  • Sandeep Krishnakumar, Catherine Berdanier, Christopher McComb, Jessica Menold (2021): Lost in Translation: Examining the Complex Relationship Between Prototyping and Communication, In: Journal of Mechanical Design 9(143), doi:10.1115/1.4049885
  • Jérémy Bonvoisin, Robert Mies, Jean-François Boujut (2021): Seven observations and research questions about Open Design and Open Source Hardware, In: Design Science, doi:10.1017/dsj.2021.14
  • Christopher Sadorge, Monika Nerland, Miria Grisot (2023): The Generative Role of Objects in Infrastructure Design: A Case of Designing a System for Continuity of Care, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 4(33), doi:10.1007/s10606-023-09485-4
  • Jessica Vechakul, Alice Agogino (2021): A Comparison of Two Transdisciplinary Human-Centered Design Approaches for Poverty Alleviation, In: The Future of Transdisciplinary Design, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06382-9_14
  • Stephanie B. Steinhardt, Steven J. Jackson (2014): Material Engagements: Putting Plans and Things Together in Collaborative Ocean Science, In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, doi:10.1109/hicss.2014.194
  • Harrison Kim, François Cluzel, Yann Leroy, Bernard Yannou, Gwenola Yannou-Le Bris (2020): Research perspectives in ecodesign, In: Design Science, doi:10.1017/dsj.2020.5
  • B. Delinchant, V. Riboulet, L. Gerbaud, P. Marin, F. Noel, F. Wurtz (2002): E-cooperative design among mechanical and electrical engineers: implications for communication between professional cultures, In: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 4(45), doi:10.1109/tpc.2002.805149
  • Nicolas Misdariis, Patrick Susini, Olivier Houix, Roque Rivas, Clément Cerles, Eric Lebel, Alice Tetienne, Aliette Duquesne (2021): Mapping Sound Properties and Oenological Characters by a Collaborative Sound Design Approach – Towards an Augmented Experience, In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70210-6_32
  • Netta Iivari (2013): Usability Specialists as Boundary Spanners – An Appraisal of Usability Specialists’ Work in Multiparty Distributed Open Source Software Development Effort, In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40480-1_40
  • Eric R. Brubaker, Sheri D. Sheppard, Pamela J. Hinds, Maria C. Yang (2023): Objects of Collaboration: Roles and Sequences of Objects in Spanning Knowledge Group Boundaries in Design, In: Journal of Mechanical Design 3(145), doi:10.1115/1.4056798
  • R. Perron, F. Laborie (2000): Augmented Tabletops, an Incentive for Distributed Collaboration, In: First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP '06), doi:10.1109/tabletop.2006.4
  • Laure Morel, Mauricio Camargo (2021): Engineering – Innovation Engineering: A Holistic and Operational Approach to the Innovation Process, In: Innovation Economics, Engineering and Management Handbook 2, doi:10.1002/9781119832522.ch2
  • Sandeep Krishkakumar, Cynthia Letting, Nicolas F. Soria Zurita, Jessica Menold (2023): If You Build It, Will They Understand? Considerations for Creating Shared Understanding Through Design Artifacts, In: Journal of Mechanical Design 3(146), doi:10.1115/1.4064239
  • Nadia Nahar, Shurui Zhou, Grace Lewis, Christian Kästner (2022): Collaboration challenges in building ML-enabled systems, In: Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering, doi:10.1145/3510003.3510209
  • Sami Paavola, Reijo Miettinen (2018): Dynamics of Design Collaboration: BIM Models as Intermediary Digital Objects, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1-2(28), doi:10.1007/s10606-018-9306-4
  • Ilaria Redaelli, Antonella Carassa (2015): Coordination-Artifacts Suiting, In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, doi:10.1145/2675133.2675136
  • Sigrid Rajalo, Maaja Vadi (2017): University-industry innovation collaboration: Reconceptualization, In: Technovation, doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2017.04.003
  • Erik Poirier, Daniel Forgues, Sheryl Staub-French (2016): Collaboration through innovation: implications for expertise in the AEC sector, In: Construction Management and Economics 11(34), doi:10.1080/01446193.2016.1206660
  • Christer W. Elverum, Torgeir Welo (2016): Leveraging prototypes to generate value in the concept-to-production process: a qualitative study of the automotive industry, In: International Journal of Production Research 10(54), doi:10.1080/00207543.2016.1152406
  • Theodore Zamenopoulos, Busayawan Lam, Katerina Alexiou, Mihaela Kelemen, Sophia De Sousa, Sue Moffat, Martin Phillips (2019): Types, obstacles and sources of empowerment in co-design: the role of shared material objects and processes, In: CoDesign 2(17), doi:10.1080/15710882.2019.1605383
  • Hamish McAlpine, Philip Cash, Ben Hicks (2017): The role of logbooks as mediators of engineering design work, In: Design Studies, doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.10.003
  • Federico Cabitza, Daniela Fogli, Antonio Piccinno (2014): “Each to His Own”: Distinguishing Activities, Roles and Artifacts in EUD Practices, In: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07040-7_19
  • Gaël Guerlesquin, Florence Bazzaro, Morad Mahdjoub, Jean-Claude Sagot (2010): Ecran virtuel multifonction, In: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine, doi:10.1145/1941007.1941049
  • Andrew Morrison, Dagny Stuedahl, Christina Mörtberg, Ina Wagner, Gunnar Liestøl, Tone Bratteteig (2010): Analytical Perspectives, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work, doi:10.1007/978-1-84996-223-0_3
  • Émilien Cristia, Pierre-Paul Zalio, François Guéna (2018): Quand le BIM met la maquette à l’épreuve du numérique, In: SHS Web of Conferences, doi:10.1051/shsconf/20184701007
  • D. Andrivon, C. Giorgetti, A. Baranger, A. Calonnec, P. Cartolaro, R. Faivre, S. Guyader, P. E. Lauri, F. Lescourret, L. Parisi, B. Ney, B. Tivoli, I. Sache (2012): Defining and designing plant architectural ideotypes to control epidemics?, In: European Journal of Plant Pathology 3(135), doi:10.1007/s10658-012-0126-y
  • Christelle Grandvallet, Franck Pourroy, Frédéric Vignat (2022): Towards a Knowledge-Based Additive Manufacturing Approach, In: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15928-2_42
  • Jean-François Boujut (2003): User-defined annotations: artefacts for co-ordination and shared understanding in design teams, In: Journal of Engineering Design 4(14), doi:10.1080/09544820310001606885
  • Ryan Ruvald, Alessandro Bertoni, Christian Johansson Askling (2019): A role for physical prototyping in Product-Service System design: Case study in construction equipment, In: Procedia CIRP, doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.099
  • Jonathan Edelman, Rebecca Currano (2010): Re-representation: Affordances of Shared Models in Team-Based Design, In: Design Thinking, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13757-0_4
  • Anthony Hussenot, Stéphanie Missonier (2010): A deeper understanding of evolution of the role of the object in organizational process, In: Journal of Organizational Change Management 3(23), doi:10.1108/09534811011049608
  • Rachael Luck (2010): Using objects to coordinate design activity in interaction, In: Construction Management and Economics 6(28), doi:10.1080/01446193.2010.489924
  • Shegaw Anagaw Mengiste, Margunn Aanestad (2013): Understanding the dynamics of learning across social worlds: A case study from implementing IS in the Ethiopian public health care system, In: Information and Organization 4(23), doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.08.001
  • C. Masclet, J.-F. Boujut, M. Poulin, Laetitia Baldaccino (2020): A socio-cognitive analysis of evaluation and idea generation activities during co-creative design sessions supported by spatial augmented reality, In: International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 1(9), doi:10.1080/21650349.2020.1854122
  • A. Hakansson, H. Nergard (2012): Discussing the role of the physical model in intra-cognitive communication, In: 2012 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), doi:10.1109/coginfocom.2012.6422033
  • Kristina Lauche (2005): Collaboration Among Designers: Analysing an Activity for System Development, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3(14), doi:10.1007/s10606-005-5413-0
  • Søsser Brodersen, Signe Pedersen (2019): Navigating Matters of Concern in Participatory Design, In: Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design 1(1), doi:10.1017/dsi.2019.102
  • Malak Sadek, Rafael A. Calvo, Céline Mougenot (2024): The Value-Sensitive Conversational Agent Co-Design Framework, In: International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2426737
  • Lionel Bennes, Florence Bazzaro, Jean-Claude Sagot (2012): Virtual reality as a support tool for ergonomic-style convergence, In: Proceedings of the 2012 Virtual Reality International Conference, doi:10.1145/2331714.2331742
  • (missing metadata) doi:10.11247/jssdj.56.93_3
  • Kristine Lund, Guy Prudhomme, Jean-Laurent Cassier (2013): Pivotal Moments for Decision Making in Collaborative Design: Are They Teachable?, In: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning at the Workplace, doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1740-8_12
  • H. Drouineau, C. Carter, M. Rambonilaza, G. Beaufaron, G. Bouleau, A. Gassiat, P. Lambert, S. le Floch, S. Tétard, E. de Oliveira (2018): River Continuity Restoration and Diadromous Fishes: Much More than an Ecological Issue, In: Environmental Management 4(61), doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0992-3
  • Nicholas de Galvez, Jacques Marsot, Patrick Martin, Ali Siadat, Alain Etienne (2017): EZID: A new approach to hazard identification during the design process by analysing energy transfers, In: Safety Science, doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.02.001
  • M. Gardoni, E. Blanco, S. Rüger (2005): MICA-Graph: a tool for managing text and sketches during design processes, In: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 4-5(16), doi:10.1007/s10845-005-1653-6
  • Thomas Reverdy (2021): Bibliographie, In: Antimanuel de management de projet, doi:10.3917/dunod.rever.2021.01.0275
  • Maude Quinio, Marie-Hélène Jeuffroy, Laurence Guichard, Paola Salazar, Françoise Détienne (2022): Analyzing co-design of agroecology-oriented cropping systems: lessons to build design-support tools, In: Agronomy for Sustainable Development 4(42), doi:10.1007/s13593-022-00772-w
  • C. Masclet, M. Poulin, J. F. Boujut, N. Becattini (2020): Real-time coding method and tool for artefact-centric interaction analysis in co-design situations assisted by augmented reality, In: International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 4(14), doi:10.1007/s12008-020-00683-8
  • Emad Khazraee (2018): Assembling narratives: Tensions in collaborative construction of knowledge, In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 4(70), doi:10.1002/asi.24133
  • (2022): References, In: The Innovation Ecosystem as a Source of Value Creation, doi:10.1002/9781394165339.refs
  • Mahenina Remiel Feno, Patrick Martin, Bruno Daille-Lefevre, Alain Etienne, Jacques Marsot, Ali Siadat (2017): Safety of machinery: requirement specification based on functional need and work situations analysis, In: International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 3(12), doi:10.1007/s12008-017-0447-3
  • Sven-Volker Rehm, Lakshmi Goel (2015): The emergence of boundary clusters in inter-organizational innovation, In: Information and Organization 1(25), doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.12.001
  • Katherine O'Toole (2023): Collaborative Creativity in TikTok Music Duets, In: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doi:10.1145/3544548.3581380
  • Velda McCune, Jenny Scoles, Sharon Boyd, Andy Cross, Pete Higgins, Rebekah Tauritz (2023): Academic identities and teaching wicked problems: how to ‘shoot a fog’ in a complex landscape, In: Higher Education Research & Development 1(43), doi:10.1080/07294360.2023.2215181
  • Colin M. Gray, Elizabeth Boling (2017): Designers’ Articulation and Activation of Instrumental Design Judgements in Cross-Cultural User Research, In: Analysing Design Thinking: Studies of Cross-Cultural Co-Creation, doi:10.1201/9781315208169-11
  • Olivier Houix, Stefano Delle Monache, Hélène Lachambre, Frédéric Bevilacqua, Davide Rocchesso, Guillaume Lemaitre (2016): Innovative Tools for Sound Sketching Combining Vocalizations and Gestures, In: Proceedings of the Audio Mostly 2016, doi:10.1145/2986416.2986442
  • Erik Glaas, Anna C. Jonsson (2014): Facilitating cross-sectoral assessments of local climate change vulnerability, In: International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development 2(6), doi:10.1080/19463138.2014.931858
Please note: Providing information about citations is only possible thanks to to the open metadata APIs provided by crossref.org and opencitations.net. These lists may be incomplete due to unavailable citation data.source: opencitations.net, crossref.org