Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Conventions and Commitments in Distributed CSCW Groups|
|Keywords:||articulation;awareness;conventions;empirical studies;groupware;shared workspace|
|metadata.dc.relation.ispartof:||Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 11|
|Series/Report no.:||Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)|
|Abstract:||Conventions are necessary to establish in any recurrentcooperative arrangement. In electronic work, they are importantso as to regulate the use of shared objects. Based on empiricalresults from a long-term study of a group cooperating inelectronic work, I present examples showing that the group failedto develop normative convention behavior. These difficulties informing conventions can be attributed to a long list of factors:the lack of clear precedents, different perspectives among groupmembers, a flexible cooperation media, limited communication, thedesign process, and discontinuous cooperation. Further, I arguethat commitments to the conventions were difficult, due to theconventions not reaching an acceptance threshold, uneven payoffs,and weak social influences. The empirical results call for aspecific set of awareness information requirements to promoteactive learning about the group activity in order to support thearticulation of conventions. The requirements focus on the roleof feedback as a powerful mechanism for shaping and learningabout group behavior.|
|Appears in Collections:||JCSCW Vol. 11 (2002)|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.