When the System does not Fit: Coping Strategies of Employment Consultants

dc.contributor.authorDolata, Mateusz
dc.contributor.authorSchenk, Birgit
dc.contributor.authorFuhrer, Jara
dc.contributor.authorMarti, Alina
dc.contributor.authorSchwabe, Gerhard
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-06T00:27:32Z
dc.date.available2020-06-06T00:27:32Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractCase and knowledge management systems are spread at the frontline across public agencies. However, such systems are dedicated for the collaboration within the agency rather than for the face-to-face interaction with the clients. If used as a collaborative resource at the frontline, case and knowledge management systems might disturb the service provision by displaying unfiltered internal information, disclosing private data of other clients, or revealing the limits of frontline employees’ competence (if they cannot explain something) or their authority (if they cannot override something). Observation in the German Public Employment Agency shows that employment consultants make use of various coping strategies during face-to-face consultations to extend existing boundaries set by the case and knowledge management systems and by the rules considering their usage. The analysis of these coping strategies unveils the forces that shape the conduct of employment consultants during their contacts with clients: the consultants’ own understanding of work, the actual and the perceived needs of the clients, and the political mission as well as the internal rules of the employment agency. The findings form a twofold contribution: First, they contribute to the discourse on work in employment agencies by illustrating how the complexities of social welfare apparatus demonstrate themselves in singular behavioural patterns. Second, they contribute to the discourse on screen-level bureaucracy by depicting the consultants as active and conscious mediators rather than passive interfaces between the system and the client.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10606-020-09377-x
dc.identifier.pissn0925-9724
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3416
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer, London
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Supported Cooperative Work
dc.relation.ispartofseriesECSCW
dc.titleWhen the System does not Fit: Coping Strategies of Employment Consultantsen
dc.typeText/Journal Article
gi.citations.count14
gi.citations.elementMateusz Dolata, Simon Schubiger, Doris Agotai, Gerhard Schwabe (2021): Changing Things so (Almost) Everything Stays the Same, In: i-com 3(20), doi:10.1515/icom-2021-0026
gi.citations.elementSeyun Kim, Jonathan Ho, Yinan Li, Bonnie Fan, Willa Yunqi Yang, Jessie Ramey, Sarah E. Fox, Haiyi Zhu, John Zimmerman, Motahhare Eslami (2024): Integrating Equity in Public Sector Data-Driven Decision Making: Exploring the Desired Futures of Underserved Stakeholders, In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction CSCW2(8), doi:10.1145/3686905
gi.citations.elementAsbjørn Ammitzbøll Flügge, Henrik Korsgaard, Susanne Bødker (2024): The Working Jobless: Unemployment as Work, In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction CSCW2(8), doi:10.1145/3686894
gi.citations.elementAnna Katharina Boos (2024): Conceptualizing Automated Decision-Making in Organizational Contexts, In: Philosophy & Technology 3(37), doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00773-5
gi.citations.elementJustine Marienfeldt (2024): Does digital government hollow out the essence of street‐level bureaucracy? A systematic literature review of how digital tools' foster curtailment, enablement and continuation of street‐level decision‐making, In: Social Policy & Administration 5(58), doi:10.1111/spol.12991
gi.citations.elementMateusz Dolata, Stefan Feuerriegel, Gerhard Schwabe (2021): A sociotechnical view of algorithmic fairness, In: Information Systems Journal 4(32), doi:10.1111/isj.12370
gi.citations.elementLars Bo Andersen, Michael Christensen, Peter Danholt, Peter Lauritsen (2022): The Role of Digital Data on Citizens in Social Work Research: A Literature Review, In: The British Journal of Social Work 2(53), doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcac158
gi.citations.elementMateusz Dolata, Dzmitry Katsiuba, Natalie Wellnhammer, Gerhard Schwabe (2023): Learning with Digital Agents: An Analysis based on the Activity Theory, In: Journal of Management Information Systems 1(40), doi:10.1080/07421222.2023.2172775
gi.citations.elementPhuc Nguyen, Mark Considine, Fadillah Putra, Anwar Sanusi (2024): Digital welfare‐to‐work in the global south: A case of Indonesian pre‐employment card program, In: Australian Journal of Social Issues, doi:10.1002/ajs4.362
gi.citations.elementIlaria Crivellari, Johanne Svanes Oskarsen, Charlotte Husom Grøder (2024): Unveiling the Invisible: Caseworkers’ Data Work in a Public Welfare Organization, In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70274-7_11
gi.citations.elementAsbjørn Ammitzbøll Flügge, Naja Holten Møller (2022): The Role of Physical Cues in Co-located and Remote Casework, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2(32), doi:10.1007/s10606-022-09449-0
gi.citations.elementDaniela Böhringer, Martin Brussig (2022): Digitalisierung in der Öffentlichen Arbeitsverwaltung, In: Handbuch Digitalisierung in Staat und Verwaltung, doi:10.1007/978-3-658-23669-4_80-1
gi.citations.elementSebastian Anselmann (2022): Learning barriers at the workplace: Development and validation of a measurement instrument, In: Frontiers in Education, doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.880778
gi.citations.elementConnie W. Chau, Kenneth Holstein, Michael Madaio (2022): Part of the Conversation: Workforce Professionals' Perspectives on the Roles and Impacts of Workforce Technologies, In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction CSCW2(6), doi:10.1145/3555135
gi.conference.date13-17 June 2020
gi.conference.locationSiegen, Germany
gi.conference.sessiontitleFull Papers
mci.conference.reviewfull

Files

Original bundle

1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ecscw2020-preprint-dolata.pdf
Size:
2.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format