Conference Paper

Algorithmic Decision Making in Public Administration: A CSCW-Perspective

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Fulltext URI

Document type

Text/Conference Paper

Additional Information

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

Abstract

In this paper, I propose a study of algorithmic decision making in public administration from a computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) perspective. Each day the public administration makes thousands of decisions with consequences for the welfare of its citizens. An increasing number of such decisions are supported or made by algorithmic decision making (ADM) systems, yet in the scientific and public sphere there is a growing concern that these algorithms become a 'black box' possibly containing hidden bias (Olsen et al., 2019), obstacles for human discretion (Rason, 2017), low transparency (Alkhatib and Bernstein, 2019) or trust (Mittelstadt et al. 2016). For example, ADM is currently tested in public administration in job placement for the prediction of a citizen's risk of long-term unemployment. Following prior research questioning the usefulness of the black box metaphor, my interest is to understand how caseworkers' and citizens understand ADM, as a basis for design of CSCW technologies employing ADM.

Description

Flügge, Asbjörn Ammitzböll (2020): Algorithmic Decision Making in Public Administration: A CSCW-Perspective. Companion Proceedings of the 2020 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work. DOI: 10.1145/3323994.3371016. Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 15–24. Sanibel Island, Florida, USA

Keywords

casework, trust, civic participation, transparency, public administration, algorithmic decision making, collaborative work

Citation

URI

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By


Load citations
Please note: Providing information about citations is only possible thanks to to the open metadata APIs provided by crossref.org and opencitations.net. These lists may be incomplete due to unavailable citation data.