Reviewing Practices in Collaborative Writing

dc.contributor.authorKim, Hee-Cheol (Ezra)
dc.contributor.authorEklundh, Kerstin Severinson
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-06T06:53:18Z
dc.date.available2020-06-06T06:53:18Z
dc.date.issued37043
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an interview study in which 11 academics as interviewees participated for the purpose of revealing common collaborative writing practices, with particular focus on reviewing documents. First, we present the findings obtained concerning the issues of co-operating strategies underlying the reviewing process, how people revise their documents and comment on them, what they use the previous revision history for, and to what extent current technology is used in the reviewing process. Second, we also discuss aspects of the design of collaborative writing tools.de
dc.identifier.doi10.1023/A:1011229212323
dc.identifier.pissn1573-7551
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011229212323
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3582
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 10, No. 2
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
dc.subjectchange notification
dc.subjectchange representation
dc.subjectcollaborative writing
dc.subjectcomment
dc.subjectcommunication
dc.subjectcoordination
dc.subjectpractice
dc.subjectreviewing
dc.subjectrevision history
dc.subjectversion management
dc.titleReviewing Practices in Collaborative Writingde
dc.typeText/Journal Article
gi.citation.endPage259
gi.citation.startPage247

Files