Journal Article

Imaginaries and Crystallization Processes in Bitcoin Infrastructuring

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Fulltext URI

Document type

Text/Journal Article

Additional Information

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Abstract

Imaginaries is a concept from Neumann and Star that signifies ‘points of understanding’ of the various stakeholder visions of an infrastructuring project. Stakeholders use imaginaries to negotiate their differences and identify shared visions. The ways in which these stakeholders negotiate these differences to agree on concrete artifacts and practices is known as crystallization. However, the CSCW literature has not studied crystallization in detail. Our case study examines imaginaries and crystallization within the infrastructuring of Bitcoin, an open source digital currency and payment platform that is the first of emerging forms of peer-to-peer computer networks facilitating digital transactions. We conducted participant observation of two Bitcoin conferences held in December 2015. Each conference lasted between two to three days, amounting to 40 hours of observation. In these conferences, we examined Bitcoin infrastructuring taking place across different contexts, including open source development and startup communities. Each of these contexts contains pre-existing infrastructures along with powerful gatekeepers (e.g., software committers and financial regulators) who maintain its system of practices and artifacts. The Bitcoin actors, including open source developers and entrepreneurs, make use of imaginaries to identify differences among them, negotiate, and reach points of crystallization in order to integrate with these infrastructures. Based on these findings, we contribute the concept of imaginaries branching and discuss roles of imaginaries in an expansive infrastructuring work interacting with multiple installed bases, some of which also introduce practical limits to the imagined information system.

Description

Kow, Yong Ming; Lustig, Caitlin (2018): Imaginaries and Crystallization Processes in Bitcoin Infrastructuring. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 27, No. 2. DOI: 10.1007/s10606-017-9300-2. Springer. PISSN: 1573-7551. pp. 209-232

Keywords

Bitcoin, Blockchain, Crystallization, Imaginaries, Infrastructuring

Citation

URI

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By


Number of citations to item: 14

  • Irni Eliana Khairuddin, Corina Sas (2019): An Exploration of Bitcoin Mining Practices, In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doi:10.1145/3290605.3300859
  • Helena Karasti, Volkmar Pipek, Geoffrey C. Bowker (2018): An Afterword to ‘Infrastructuring and Collaborative Design’, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2(27), doi:10.1007/s10606-017-9305-x
  • Paul Dylan-Ennis, Donncha Kavanagh, Luis Araujo (2022): The dynamic imaginaries of the Ethereum project, In: Economy and Society 1(52), doi:10.1080/03085147.2022.2131280
  • Malcolm Campbell-Verduyn (2023): Conjuring a cooler world? Imaginaries of Improvement in Blockchain Climate Finance Experiments, In: Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 5(42), doi:10.1177/23996544231162858
  • Arturo Castro, Andreu Belsunces (2025): Cryptofinancial imaginaries: how neoliberal theories are materialized in the technical principles of cryptocurrencies, In: Journal of Cultural Economy, doi:10.1080/17530350.2024.2436869
  • Ali Sunyaev (2024): Distributed Ledger Technology, In: Internet Computing, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61014-1_8
  • Dane Pflueger, Martin Kornberger, JAN Mouritsen (2022): What is Blockchain Accounting? A Critical Examination in Relation to Organizing, Governance, and Trust, In: European Accounting Review, doi:10.1080/09638180.2022.2147973
  • Karim Jabbar, Pernille Bjørn (2018): Permeability, Interoperability, and Velocity, In: ACM Transactions on Social Computing 3(1), doi:10.1145/3288800
  • Dawn Walker, Mai Ishikawa Sutton, Udit Vira, Benedict Lau (2022): Commoning for Fun and Profit: Experimental Publishing on the Decentralized Web, In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction CSCW2(6), doi:10.1145/3555126
  • Victoria Neumann, Mike Harding, Nigel Davies (2023): DAOing It as a Collective: Designing the Future of Decentralised Personal Health Data Sharing, In: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doi:10.1145/3544549.3585645
  • Dave Murray-Rust, Chris Elsden, Bettina Nissen, Ella Tallyn, Larissa Pschetz, Chris Speed (2022): Blockchain and Beyond: Understanding Blockchains Through Prototypes and Public Engagement, In: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 5(29), doi:10.1145/3503462
  • Kelsie Nabben (2023): Web3 as ‘self-infrastructuring’: The challenge is how, In: Big Data & Society 1(10), doi:10.1177/20539517231159002
  • Arnoud Lagendijk, Bas Hillebrand, Eva Kalmar, Ingrid van Marion, Maarten van der Sanden (2019): Blockchain innovation and framing in the Netherlands: How a technological object turns into a ‘hyperobject’, In: Technology in Society, doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101175
  • Paul Dylan-Ennis (2024): Hash, Bash, Cash: How Change Happens in Decentralized Web3 Cultures, In: Defining Web3: A Guide to the New Cultural Economy, doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20240000089007
Please note: Providing information about citations is only possible thanks to to the open metadata APIs provided by crossref.org and opencitations.net. These lists may be incomplete due to unavailable citation data.source: opencitations.net, crossref.org