Journal Article

Regional Differences in Information Privacy Concerns After the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica Data Scandal

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Fulltext URI

Document type

Text/Journal Article

Additional Information

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Abstract

While there is increasing global attention to data privacy, most of their current theoretical understanding is based on research conducted in a few countries. Prior work argues that people’s cultural backgrounds might shape their privacy concerns; thus, we could expect people from different world regions to conceptualize them in diverse ways. We collected and analyzed a large-scale dataset of tweets about the #CambridgeAnalytica scandal in Spanish and English to start exploring this hypothesis. We employed word embeddings and qualitative analysis to identify which information privacy concerns are present and characterize language and regional differences in emphasis on these concerns. Our results suggest that related concepts, such as regulations, can be added to current information privacy frameworks. We also observe a greater emphasis on data collection in English than in Spanish. Additionally, data from North America exhibits a narrower focus on awareness compared to other regions under study. Our results call for more diverse sources of data and nuanced analysis of data privacy concerns around the globe.

Description

González-Pizarro, Felipe; Figueroa, Andrea; López, Claudia; Aragon, Cecilia (2022): Regional Differences in Information Privacy Concerns After the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica Data Scandal. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 31, No. 1. DOI: 10.1007/s10606-021-09422-3. Springer. PISSN: 1573-7551. pp. 33-77

Keywords

Content analysis, IUIPC, Online privacy, Twitter, Word embedding

Citation

URI

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By


Load citations
Please note: Providing information about citations is only possible thanks to to the open metadata APIs provided by crossref.org and opencitations.net. These lists may be incomplete due to unavailable citation data.