On the Relevance of Habermas‘ Theory of Communicative Action for CSCW

dc.contributor.authorSharrock, Wes
dc.contributor.authorButton, Graham
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-06T06:24:22Z
dc.date.available2020-06-06T06:24:22Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.date.issued1997
dc.description.abstractWe examine the argument put forward by Ojelanki Nygwenyama andKalle Lyytinen that Juergen Habermas's theory of communicativeaction is relevant for the analysis and design of groupwaresystems. We suggest that CSCW champions of Habermas oftenoverlook the fact that his theory can be criticised in itsown right, and go on to outline its contestable character inan appraisal of his understanding of the ‘ideal speech situation’.We then move to Nygwenyama and Lyytinen's implementation ofHabermas's schema and argue that their categories of analysisare both arbitrarily constructed and applied. In conclusion,we question the extent to which grand, holistic, synthesisingsociological theories offer a way forward for designers andpoint to the difficulties of practically applying Nygwenyamaand Lyytinen's categories of analysis.de
dc.identifier.doi10.1023/A:1008644224566
dc.identifier.pissn1573-7551
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008644224566
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3512
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 6, No. 4
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
dc.subjectCommunicative action
dc.subjectGroupware
dc.subjectHabermas
dc.subjectSocial action
dc.titleOn the Relevance of Habermas‘ Theory of Communicative Action for CSCWde
dc.typeText/Journal Article
gi.citation.endPage389
gi.citation.startPage369
gi.citations.count12
gi.citations.elementDavid J. Schaefer, Brenda Dervin (2009): From the dialogic to the contemplative: a conceptual and empirical rethinking of online communication outcomes as verbing micro-practices, In: Ethics and Information Technology 4(11), doi:10.1007/s10676-009-9206-x
gi.citations.elementVivien Hodgson, Michael Reynolds (2005): Consensus, difference and ‘multiple communities’ in networked learning, In: Studies in Higher Education 1(30), doi:10.1080/0307507052000307768
gi.citations.elementKaija Marjukka Collin, Ulla Maija Valleala, Sanna Herranen, Susanna Paloniemi (2011): Ways of interprofessional collaboration and learning in emergency work, In: Studies in Continuing Education 3(34), doi:10.1080/0158037x.2011.617364
gi.citations.elementDavid J. Schaefer, Brenda Dervin (2000): Online Learning in Discussion Groups, In: User-Driven Healthcare and Narrative Medicine, doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-097-6.ch020
gi.citations.elementGraham Button, Wes Sharrock (2009): Studies of Work and the Workplace in HCI, In: Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, doi:10.2200/s00177ed1v01y200903hci003
gi.citations.elementElisabeth Joyce, Jacqueline C. Pike, Brian S. Butler (2012): Rules and Roles vs. Consensus, In: American Behavioral Scientist 5(57), doi:10.1177/0002764212469366
gi.citations.elementSean Hansen, Nicholas Berente, Kalle Lyytinen (2009): Wikipedia, Critical Social Theory, and the Possibility of Rational Discourse, In: The Information Society 1(25), doi:10.1080/01972240802587562
gi.citations.elementPär J Ågerfalk, Owen Eriksson (2006): Socio–instrumental Usability: IT is all about Social Action<sup>1</sup>, In: Journal of Information Technology 1(21), doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000055
gi.citations.elementSean Hansen, Nicholas Berente, Kalle Lyytinen (2007): Wikipedia as Rational Discourse: An Illustration of the Emancipatory Potential of Information Systems, In: 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07), doi:10.1109/hicss.2007.616
gi.citations.elementPär J Ågerfalk, Göran Goldkuhl, Brian Fitzgerald, Liam Bannon (2006): Reflecting on action in language, organisations and information systems, In: European Journal of Information Systems 1(15), doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000607
gi.citations.elementPär J Ågerfalk (2004): Investigating actability dimensions: a language/action perspective on criteria for information systems evaluation, In: Interacting with Computers 5(16), doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2004.05.002
gi.citations.elementKalle Lyytinen, Ojelanki Ngwenyama (1999): Sharrock and Button ... and Much Ado about Nothing, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3(8), doi:10.1023/a:1008720609782

Files