Journal Article

Enterprise-Level Groupware Choices: Evaluating Lotus Notes and Intranet-Based Solutions

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Fulltext URI

Document type

Text/Journal Article

Additional Information

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Abstract

This paper considers collaborative software atthe enterprise level, specifically Lotus Notesand alternatives which use Intranet-based (WorldWide Web) technologies. We examine thestrategic reasons, both short-term and long-term, motivating firms' choices in the decisionphase and organizational issues in theimplementation phase in three exploratory casestudies. We review prior coordinationtechnology literature to show that our focus onthe decision faced by senior management of whichgroupware system to implement is a useful andnovel perspective to pursue. We argue thatthis choice, and its consequences, is of crucialimportance to the firm. To understand morefully the nature of the decision, we consider athematic pair of related issues: Internetstandards and interoperability. Why are so-called ‘Open Systems’ a major factor to some firms and notimportant to others? Why is theproprietary nature of Lotus Notes a stumblingblock to some firms and a strategic advantage toothers? We explore enterprise-level groupwareexpectations and requirements in our casestudies to address these interesting questions. The final section focuses on predicting changeto understand when an organization might reverseits initial enterprise-wide collaborative strategy.

Description

Ginsburg, Mark; Duliba, Katherine (1997): Enterprise-Level Groupware Choices: Evaluating Lotus Notes and Intranet-Based Solutions. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 6, No. 2-3. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008612731394. Springer. PISSN: 1573-7551. pp. 201-225

Keywords

Enterprise-level groupware, inter-operability, Intranet, Lotus Notes, standards, World Wide Web

Citation

URI

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By


Number of citations to item: 9

  • Hung-pin Shih, Kee-hung Lai, T. C. E. Cheng (2013): Examining structural, perceptual, and attitudinal influences on the quality of information sharing in collaborative technology use, In: Information Systems Frontiers 2(17), doi:10.1007/s10796-013-9429-6
  • Alea M. Fairchild (2004): Groups and Collaborative Technology, In: Technological Aspects of Virtual Organizations, doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3211-6_2
  • Zhong Wei Wang, Yan An (2013): The Analysis on the Construction of CSCW System and Group Collaborative Mode, In: Advanced Materials Research, doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.756-759.2966
  • Alan Dix (1997): Challenges for Cooperative Work on the Web: An Analytical Approach, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2-3(6), doi:10.1023/a:1008635907287
  • Antonietta Grasso, Jean-Luc Meunier, Daniele Pagani, Remo Pareschi (1997): Distributed Coordination and Workflow on the World Wide Web, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2-3(6), doi:10.1023/a:1008652312739
  • M. Ginsburg, A. Kambil (2000): Annotate: a Web-based knowledge management support system for document collections, In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers, doi:10.1109/hicss.1999.772797
  • P. Bjorn, J. Simonsen (2000): Joint Enterprise and the Role of the Intermediator: Challenges Managing Groupware in Global Virtual Teams, In: 16th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA'05), doi:10.1109/dexa.2005.123
  • Mayyad Jaber, Youakim Badr, Frederique Biennier (2000): Building Global Workflow From The Scratch, In: IFIP – The International Federation for Information Processing, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77249-3_39
  • Hung-Pin Shih (2009): Predicting Groupware Use from the Perspectives of Workflow, Information and Coordination, In: 2009 Seventh International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing, doi:10.1109/c5.2009.12
Please note: Providing information about citations is only possible thanks to to the open metadata APIs provided by crossref.org and opencitations.net. These lists may be incomplete due to unavailable citation data.source: opencitations.net, crossref.org