Conference Paper

Ethics for the 'Common Good': Actionable Guidelines for Community-based Design Research

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Fulltext URI

Document type

Text/Conference Paper

Additional Information

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

ACM Press, New York

Abstract

This workshop is themed around the ethics of -- potentially disruptive -- design research in collaboration with social communities. Disruption may lead to conflict and 'cultural resistance' on part of communities, despite the noble intentions of research-practitioners and designers. Ethical design is not a novel concept, but it remains fundamental in the contemporary undertakings of innovative and technology-oriented research. During this workshop, therefore, participants will ideate and develop practical, actionable guidelines for conducting design-and innovation-oriented research with, for and in communities (both virtual and physical). Workshop participants will be invited to consider the philosophical-conceptual questions around 'ethical, collective design' in the internet age. Participants will especially be invited to problematise the ethical nature of their practice, and subsequently, to build toward critical, empathetic and more informed practice. The workshop aims to involve design-researchers from various disciplines and who carry out some form of community-based work.

Description

Van Zyl, I.; Winschiers, H.; De la Harpe, R. (2017): Ethics for the 'Common Good': Actionable Guidelines for Community-based Design Research. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies. DOI: 10.1145/3083671.3083709. ACM Press, New York. ISBN: 978-1-4503-4854-6. pp. 298-300. Long Papers. Troyes, France. June 26-30, 2017

Keywords

Ethics, communities, design research, digital technology

Citation

URI

URI

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By


Load citations
Please note: Providing information about citations is only possible thanks to to the open metadata APIs provided by crossref.org and opencitations.net. These lists may be incomplete due to unavailable citation data.