Text Document

Episteme or practice? Differentiated Communitarian Structures in a Biology Laboratory

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Fulltext URI

Document type

Text

Additional Information

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer London, Dordrecht Amsterdam

Abstract

This paper explores the different social structures coexisting within a biology laboratory. This work draws upon an empirical study and the results are analysed using the social network analysis toolbox. We evidence that actors form links between them in order to carry out cognitive activities. Depending on the content of this activity, resulting networks can take different shapes. When dealing with scientific knowledge, actors tend to form an epistemic community, whereas they form a community of practice when they seek to enhance their skills in setting experiments. Moreover, these two structures are connected by means of boundary objects and boundary spanners.

Description

Créplet, F.; Dupouët, O.; Vaast, E. (2003): Episteme or practice? Differentiated Communitarian Structures in a Biology Laboratory. Communities and Technologies: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Communities and Technologies 2003. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0115-0_3. Springer London, Dordrecht Amsterdam. ISBN: 978-94-017-0115-0. pp. 43-63. Full Papers

Keywords

Citation

URI

URI

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By


Number of citations to item: 12

  • Karen A. Tallman, Allan Feldman (2016): The Use of Journal Clubs in Science Teacher Education, In: Journal of Science Teacher Education 3(27), doi:10.1007/s10972-016-9462-7
  • Walter Santagata (2010): Two Models of Creativity: Technological Innovation and Social Quality, In: The Culture Factory, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13358-9_5
  • Brenda M. Capobianco, Allan Feldman (2006): Promoting quality for teacher action research: lessons learned from science teachers’ action research, In: Educational Action Research 4(14), doi:10.1080/09650790600975668
  • Giovanni Faleg (2016): The Framework of Analysis: Learning Communities in International Organisations, In: The EU's Common Security and Defence Policy, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41306-8_2
  • Widad Guechtouli, Juliette Rouchier, Magali Orillard (2013): Structuring knowledge transfer from experts to newcomers, In: Journal of Knowledge Management 1(17), doi:10.1108/13673271311300741
  • ALLAN FELDMAN, KENT A. DIVOLL, ALLYSON ROGAN‐KLYVE (2013): Becoming Researchers: The Participation of Undergraduate and Graduate Students in Scientific Research Groups, In: Science Education 2(97), doi:10.1002/sce.21051
  • Allan Feldman, Kent Divoll, Allyson Rogan‐Klyve (2009): Research education of new scientists: Implications for science teacher education, In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching 4(46), doi:10.1002/tea.20285
  • Giovanni Faleg (2016): Introduction: Ideas that Changed the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy, In: The EU's Common Security and Defence Policy, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41306-8_1
  • Allan Feldman (2007): Validity and quality in action research, In: Educational Action Research 1(15), doi:10.1080/09650790601150766
  • Cheng-Yong Tan (2012): Instructional leadership: toward a contextualised knowledge creation model, In: School Leadership & Management 2(32), doi:10.1080/13632434.2011.614944
  • Brenda M. Capobianco, Allan Feldman (2010): Repositioning Teacher Action Research in Science Teacher Education, In: Journal of Science Teacher Education 8(21), doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9219-7
  • Ashwin Mohan, Gregory J. Kelly (2020): Nature of Science and Nature of Scientists, In: Science & Education 5(29), doi:10.1007/s11191-020-00158-y
Please note: Providing information about citations is only possible thanks to to the open metadata APIs provided by crossref.org and opencitations.net. These lists may be incomplete due to unavailable citation data.source: opencitations.net, crossref.org