Supporting Group Decisions by Mediating Deliberation to Improve Information Pooling

dc.contributor.authorIntrone, Joshua E.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-08T11:44:31Z
dc.date.available2023-06-08T11:44:31Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractGroup decision support systems (GDSS) hold significant potential for improving decision making, but they have not been broadly adopted. One reason for this is that these platforms introduce representational work for users that is distinct from a more familiar deliberative interaction but they offer uncertain payoff. This article presents a study with a platform that addresses this problem by leveraging the argumentative structure of deliberative conversation to drive a decision support algorithm. The platform uses argument visualization to mediate the collaborators' conversation. The study demonstrates that the platform addresses a known deficiency in human information pooling called the common knowledge phenomenon.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/1531674.1531702
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/4871
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the 2009 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
dc.subjectcollaborative argument visualization
dc.subjectgroup decision support
dc.titleSupporting Group Decisions by Mediating Deliberation to Improve Information Poolingen
gi.citation.publisherPlaceNew York, NY, USA
gi.citation.startPage189–198
gi.conference.locationSanibel Island, Florida, USA

Files

Collections