The Life and Death of Design Ideas

dc.contributor.authorBratteteig, Tone
dc.contributor.authorRolstad, Ole Kristian
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Ina
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-30T21:34:56Z
dc.date.available2017-08-30T21:34:56Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThe paper explores the question why a design process ends up with a particular result. We analyze a collaborative design process where different stakeholders design an urban site using a participatory design tool. Our analysis is based on Schön’s view of design as a process of ‘seeing-moving-seeing’ combined with the concept of choice from Schütz. Analyzing the case provides an understanding of the ways in which ideas ‘move’ a design. We describe the dynamics of collaborative design work where design ideas are moved forward or deliberately blocked from being pursued further. We point to how design decisions are interlinked, making it possible to see how some design decisions are more important than others. Our analysis is narrative in character, but we also present a technique for visualizing the ‘life and death’ of design ideas.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-33464-6_16
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-319-33463-9
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofCOOP 2016: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems
dc.titleThe Life and Death of Design Ideasen
dc.typeText/Conference Paper
gi.citation.endPage275
gi.citation.startPage259
gi.citations.count8
gi.citations.elementNanna Inie, Peter Dalsgaard (2017): A Typology of Design Ideas, In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, doi:10.1145/3059454.3059464
gi.citations.elementPolyxeni Vassilakopoulou, Miria Grisot, Margunn Aanestad (2018): Between Personal and Common: the Design of Hybrid Information Spaces, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3-6(27), doi:10.1007/s10606-017-9304-y
gi.citations.elementPernille Bjørn, Mark Wulff, Mathias Schmidt Petræus, Naja Holten Møller (2021): Immersive Cooperative Work Environments (CWE): Designing Human-Building Interaction in Virtual Reality, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3(30), doi:10.1007/s10606-021-09395-3
gi.citations.elementGraham Dove, Caroline Emilie Lundqvist, Kim Halskov (2018): The life cycle of a generative design metaphor, In: Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, doi:10.1145/3240167.3240190
gi.citations.elementKlaudia Çarçani, Tone Bratteteig, Harald Holone, Jo Herstad (2023): EquiP: A Method to Co-Design for Cooperation, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3(32), doi:10.1007/s10606-023-09463-w
gi.citations.elementStephanie Arevalo Arboleda, Max Pascher, Annalies Baumeister, Barbara Klein, Jens Gerken (2021): Reflecting upon Participatory Design in Human-Robot Collaboration for People with Motor Disabilities: Challenges and Lessons Learned from Three Multiyear Projects, In: Proceedings of the 14th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference, doi:10.1145/3453892.3458044
gi.citations.elementMarianne Kinnula, Tonja Molin-Juustila, Iván Sánchez Milara, Marta Cortes, Jukka Riekki (2017): What if it Switched on the Sun? Exploring Creativity in a Brainstorming Session with Children Through a Vygotskyan Perspective, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 4-6(26), doi:10.1007/s10606-017-9280-2
gi.citations.elementTone Bratteteig, Ina Wagner (2016): Unpacking the Notion of Participation in Participatory Design, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 6(25), doi:10.1007/s10606-016-9259-4
gi.conference.date23-27 May 2016
gi.conference.locationTrento, Italy

Files