Evaluating the Usability of an Evolving Collaborative Product —Changes in User Type, Tasks and Evaluation Methods over Time
| dc.contributor.author | Nodder, Chris | |
| dc.contributor.author | Williams, Gayna | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dubrow, Deborah | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-08T11:41:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-06-08T11:41:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1999 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The first users of a new technology are often engineers and enthusiasts. The functionality and interface that they find acceptable may be very different than the requirements of a more mainstream audience. This poses challenges for usability engineers in both defining user groups and then evaluating a product against usability goals, when both users and goals are changing as the technology matures. Usability evaluation methods for collaborative applications must evolve and iterate at least as fast as the products themselves. This paper describes the changes in approach taken by usability engineers between Version 1 and Version 3 of the Microsoft NetMeeting product. | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1145/320297.320314 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/4744 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Association for Computing Machinery | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Proceedings of the 1999 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work | |
| dc.subject | development process | |
| dc.subject | design consideration | |
| dc.subject | NetMeeting | |
| dc.subject | collaborative tools | |
| dc.subject | usability evaluation | |
| dc.subject | application sharing | |
| dc.title | Evaluating the Usability of an Evolving Collaborative Product —Changes in User Type, Tasks and Evaluation Methods over Time | en |
| gi.citation.publisherPlace | New York, NY, USA | |
| gi.citation.startPage | 150–159 | |
| gi.citations.count | 6 | |
| gi.citations.element | Matthew K. Miller, Martin Johannes Dechant, Regan L. Mandryk (2021): Meeting You, Seeing Me: The Role of Social Anxiety, Visual Feedback, and Interface Layout in a Get-to-Know-You Task via Video Chat., In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doi:10.1145/3411764.3445664 | |
| gi.citations.element | Obead Alhadreti (2020): Comparing Two Methods of Usability Testing in Saudi Arabia: Concurrent Think-Aloud vs. Co-Discovery, In: International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2(37), doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1809152 | |
| gi.citations.element | Matthew K. Miller, Regan L. Mandryk, Max V. Birk, Ansgar E. Depping, Tushita Patel (2017): Through the Looking Glass, In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, doi:10.1145/3025453.3025548 | |
| gi.citations.element | Maaike J. van den Haak, Menno D. T. de Jong, Peter Jan Schellens (2006): Constructive Interaction: An Analysis of Verbal Interaction in a Usability Setting, In: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 4(49), doi:10.1109/tpc.2006.885865 | |
| gi.citations.element | Georgia Braude, Simone Mohi, Elly Quinlan, Anthony Shoullis, James Collison (2023): Psychologists and their self-mirror: therapy experiences via videoconferencing, In: Clinical Psychologist 3(27), doi:10.1080/13284207.2023.2245953 | |
| gi.citations.element | Abdul Rauf, Sadia Batool, Shafiq Ur Rehman, Arshad Ali Shahid (2010): Survey based usability evaluation of MS Word, In: 2010 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), doi:10.1109/iuser.2010.5716750 | |
| gi.conference.location | Phoenix, Arizona, USA |