Coordinative Entities: Forms of Organizing in Data Intensive Science
dc.contributor.author | Paine, Drew | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Charlotte P. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-13T20:53:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-13T20:53:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.description.abstract | Scientific collaboration is a long-standing subject of CSCW scholarship that typically focuses on the development and use of computing systems to facilitate research. The research presented in this article investigates the sociality of science by identifying and describing particular, common forms of organizing that researchers in four different scientific realms employ to conduct work in both local contexts and as part of distributed, global projects. This paper introduces five prototypical forms of organizing we categorize as coordinative entities: the Principal Group, Intermittent Exchange, Sustained Aggregation, Federation, and Facility Organization. Coordinative entities as a categorization help specify, articulate, compare, and trace overlapping and evolving arrangements scientists use to facilitate data intensive research. We use this typology to unpack complexities of data intensive scientific collaboration in four cases, showing how scientists invoke different coordinative entities across three types of research activities: data collection, processing, and analysis. Our contribution scrutinizes the sociality of scientific work to illustrate how these actors engage in relational work within and among diverse, dispersed forms of organizing across project, funding, and disciplinary boundaries. | de |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10606-020-09372-2 | |
dc.identifier.pissn | 1573-7551 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-020-09372-2 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/4058 | |
dc.publisher | Springer | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 29, No. 3 | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) | |
dc.subject | Articulation work | |
dc.subject | Coordinative entities | |
dc.subject | Coordinated actions | |
dc.subject | Cyberinfrastructure | |
dc.subject | Data intensive science | |
dc.subject | Data science | |
dc.subject | Human infrastructure | |
dc.subject | Infrastructure | |
dc.subject | Synergizing | |
dc.title | Coordinative Entities: Forms of Organizing in Data Intensive Science | de |
dc.type | Text/Journal Article | |
gi.citation.endPage | 380 | |
gi.citation.startPage | 335 | |
gi.citations.count | 6 | |
gi.citations.element | Melanie Duckert, Charlotte Lee, Pernille Bjørn (2025): The Ripple Effect of Information Infrastructures, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1(34), doi:10.1007/s10606-024-09509-7 | |
gi.citations.element | Luis E. Sepúlveda-Rodríguez, José Luis Garrido, Julio C. Chavarro-Porras, John A. Sanabria-Ordoñez, Christian A. Candela-Uribe, Carlos Rodríguez-Domínguez, Gabriel Guerrero-Contreras (2021): Study-based Systematic Mapping Analysis of Cloud Technologies for Leveraging IT Resource and Service Management: The Case Study of the Science Gateway Approach, In: Journal of Grid Computing 4(19), doi:10.1007/s10723-021-09587-7 | |
gi.citations.element | Ridley Jones, Cathrine F. Seidelin, Andrew B. Neang, Charlotte P. Lee (2023): Lessons Learned from a Comparative Study of Long-Term Action Research with Community Design of Infrastructural Systems, In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction CSCW1(7), doi:10.1145/3579502 | |
gi.citations.element | Lorna Heaton (2022): Chains of Participation in Producing Biodiversity Infrastructures: Digital Reconfigurations of Scientific Work, In: Science as Culture 3(33), doi:10.1080/09505431.2022.2025774 | |
gi.citations.element | Götz Hoeppe (2021): Encoding Collective Knowledge, Instructing Data Reusers: The Collaborative Fixation of a Digital Scientific Data Set, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 4(30), doi:10.1007/s10606-021-09407-2 | |
gi.citations.element | Ridley Jones LeDoux, Charlotte P. Lee, Sucheta Ghoshal, Mark Haselkorn (2024): Concept of Operations as Epistemic Object: The Sociotechnical Design Roles of a Systems Engineering Document, In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction CSCW1(8), doi:10.1145/3637311 |