ML-DEWS: Modeling Language to Support Dynamic Evolution within Workflow Systems
| dc.contributor.author | Ellis, Clarence | |
| dc.contributor.author | Keddara, Karim | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-06T06:53:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-06-06T06:53:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2000 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2000 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Organizations that are geared for success within today's business environments must be capable of rapid and continuous change. Dynamic change is a large and pervasive problem which surfaces within organizational workflowsas well as within soft ware engineering, manufacturing, and numerous other domains. Procedural changes, performed in an ad hoc manner, can cause inefficiencies, inconsistencies, and catastrophic breakdowns within organizations. This document is concerned with change, especially dynamic change, to organizational procedures. We explain a taxonomy of change modalities, and present a modeling language for the unambiguous specification of procedural change. This language, call ML-DEWS , complements the formal model of dynamic change previously presented by the authors. Issues of exception handling, temporal specification, and participatory change are conveniently handled within the framework presented in this document. | de |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1023/A:1008799125984 | |
| dc.identifier.pissn | 1573-7551 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008799125984 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3574 | |
| dc.publisher | Springer | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 9, No. 3-4 | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) | |
| dc.subject | case migration | |
| dc.subject | change modalities | |
| dc.subject | dynamic procedural change | |
| dc.title | ML-DEWS: Modeling Language to Support Dynamic Evolution within Workflow Systems | de |
| dc.type | Text/Journal Article | |
| gi.citation.endPage | 333 | |
| gi.citation.startPage | 293 | |
| gi.citations.count | 26 | |
| gi.citations.element | S.A. Barretto, J. Warren, A. Goodchild (2004): Designing guideline-based workflow-enabled electronic health records, In: 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the, doi:10.1109/hicss.2004.1265353 | |
| gi.citations.element | Wan-Chun Dou, Juan Sun, Da-Gang Yang, Shi-Jie Cai (2004): Data and Interaction Oriented Workflow Execution, In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24680-0_164 | |
| gi.citations.element | Xiao Hong Yang, Yue Feng Chen, Xiu Yu Zhong (2014): Application and Realization of Workflow Engine in OA, In: Applied Mechanics and Materials, doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.556-562.5404 | |
| gi.citations.element | Lorenzo Capra, Walter Cazzola (2007): A Reflective PN-Based Approach to Dynamic Workflow Change, In: Ninth International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC 2007), doi:10.1109/synasc.2007.64 | |
| gi.citations.element | Harry Jiannan Wang, J. Leon Zhao (2011): Constraint-centric workflow change analytics, In: Decision Support Systems 3(51), doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.03.001 | |
| gi.citations.element | C. Huth, I. Erdmann, L. Nastansky (2000): GroupProcess: using process knowledge from the participative design and practical operation of ad hoc processes for the design of structured workflows, In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, doi:10.1109/hicss.2001.927236 | |
| gi.citations.element | Marcos R. S. Borges, José A. Pino, Renata M. Araujo (2006): Common Context for Decisions and their Implementations, In: Group Decision and Negotiation 3(15), doi:10.1007/s10726-006-9019-9 | |
| gi.citations.element | K. H. Fung, G. C. Low (2011): Quality factors for dynamic evolution in composition-based distributed applications, In: ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems 1(42), doi:10.1145/1952712.1952715 | |
| gi.citations.element | Stephan Poelmans, Hajo A. Reijers, Jan Recker (2013): Investigating the success of operational business process management systems, In: Information Technology and Management 4(14), doi:10.1007/s10799-013-0167-8 | |
| gi.citations.element | Kam Hay Fung, Graham Cedric Low (2009): Methodology evaluation framework for dynamic evolution in composition-based distributed applications, In: Journal of Systems and Software 12(82), doi:10.1016/j.jss.2009.06.032 | |
| gi.citations.element | Schahram Dustdar, Thomas Hoffmann, Wil van der Aalst (2005): Mining of ad-hoc business processes with TeamLog, In: Data & Knowledge Engineering 2(55), doi:10.1016/j.datak.2005.02.002 | |
| gi.citations.element | D.D. Zeng, J.L. Zhao (2000): Achieving software flexibility via intelligent workflow techniques, In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, doi:10.1109/hicss.2002.993941 | |
| gi.citations.element | W W C Derks, R H Weston (2005): A model of exceptions in sales-order-processing workflows, In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 2(219), doi:10.1243/095440505x8172 | |
| gi.citations.element | Nanshan Du, Qing Li, Yiwen Liang, Farong Zhong (2010): Actor Petri net Model: toward Suitable and Flexible Level Representation of Scientific Workflows, In: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9794-1_16 | |
| gi.citations.element | Abraham Bernstein (2000): How can cooperative work tools support dynamic group process? bridging the specificity frontier, In: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, doi:10.1145/358916.358999 | |
| gi.citations.element | Guangxin Yang (2003): Process inheritance and instance modification, In: Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, doi:10.1145/958160.958196 | |
| gi.citations.element | Diwakar Yagyasen, Manuj Darbari (2014): Application of Semantic Web and Petri Calculus in Changing Business Scenario, In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06740-7_44 | |
| gi.citations.element | Eric Badouel, Loïc Hélouët, Georges-Edouard Kouamou, Christophe Morvan, Nsaibirni Robert Fondze (2015): Active workspaces, In: ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review 3(15), doi:10.1145/2835260.2835261 | |
| gi.citations.element | Alfred Fent, Herbert Reiter, Burkhard Freitag (2002): Design for Change: Evolving Workflow Specifications in ULTRAflow, In: Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, doi:10.1007/3-540-47961-9_36 | |
| gi.citations.element | H. A. Reijers, J. H. M. Rigter, W. M. P. van der Aalst (2003): The Case Handling Case, In: International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 03(12), doi:10.1142/s0218843003000784 | |
| gi.citations.element | W. M. P. van der Aalst (2003): Inheritance of Business Processes: A Journey Visiting Four Notorious Problems, In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-40022-6_19 | |
| gi.citations.element | Xinqin Gao, Xueping Wang, Yan Li, Mingshun Yang, Yong Liu, Weichao Guo (2015): Workflow dynamic change and instance migration approach based on polychromatic sets theory, In: International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 4(29), doi:10.1080/0951192x.2015.1034181 | |
| gi.citations.element | W.M.P van der Aalst, T Basten (2002): Inheritance of workflows: an approach to tackling problems related to change, In: Theoretical Computer Science 1-2(270), doi:10.1016/s0304-3975(00)00321-2 | |
| gi.citations.element | Song Ji, Weifang Zhai, Yiran Jiang (2019): Design of Workflow Engine Based on Relational Structures, In: International Journal of Advanced Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing 4(11), doi:10.4018/ijapuc.2019100103 | |
| gi.citations.element | Takahiro Murata, Naftaly H. Minsky (2002): Regulating Work in Digital Enterprises: A Flexible Managerial Framework, In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, doi:10.1007/3-540-36124-3_21 | |
| gi.citations.element | Z.M. Qiu, Y.S. Wong (2007): Dynamic workflow change in PDM systems, In: Computers in Industry 5(58), doi:10.1016/j.compind.2006.09.014 |