Social control and social contract in networking
dc.contributor.author | Klein, H. K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kraft, Philip | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-06T00:42:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-06T00:42:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1993 | |
dc.date.issued | 1993 | |
dc.description.abstract | Networks can be understood as organizational control strategies. As an example, we present two case studies of team-based networking strategies associated with the Total Quality Management movement in the United States. TQM's implied social contract requires some form of power sharing. In practice TQM team organization can also become another form of labor intensification. Similarly, TQM appeals to democratic values by emphasizing participation, communication, cooperation and team work. Such claims can also serve to legitimize major organizational changes, some of which follow familiar Taylorist patterns. Two cases illustrate how the technical components of communications systems help redefine control systems in TQM-based work rerganization experiments. In the manufacturing setting, communications took the form of web-and-hub networks, centralizing off-site engineering control of production workers. In the design and engineering workplace, peer-to-peer communications implemented by self-managed teams reduced intellectual ‘slack time’. In both cases the communications systems provided means to intensify labor. | de |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/BF00749285 | |
dc.identifier.pissn | 1573-7551 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00749285 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3442 | |
dc.publisher | Springer | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 2, No. 1-2 | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Computer Supported Cooperative Work | |
dc.subject | Communication | |
dc.subject | Control | |
dc.subject | Empowerment | |
dc.subject | Social Contract | |
dc.subject | Teams | |
dc.subject | TQM | |
dc.title | Social control and social contract in networking | de |
dc.type | Text/Journal Article | |
gi.citation.endPage | 108 | |
gi.citation.startPage | 89 | |
gi.citations.count | 5 | |
gi.citations.element | Lynette Kvasny, Duane Truex (2000): Information Technology and the Cultural Reproduction of Social Order: A Research Paradigm, In: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-35505-4_17 | |
gi.citations.element | Caroline Simard, Ronald E. Rice (2006): Managerial information behaviour: Relationships among Total Quality Management orientation, information use environments, and managerial roles, In: Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 1(17), doi:10.1080/14783360500249620 | |
gi.citations.element | Valter Moreno (1999): On the social implications of organizational reengineering, In: Information Technology & People 4(12), doi:10.1108/09593849910301612 | |
gi.citations.element | Arto Lanamäki, Karin Väyrynen (2016): Six Issues in Which IS and CSCW Research Communities Differ, In: COOP 2016: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 23-27 May 2016, Trento, Italy, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33464-6_1 | |
gi.citations.element | Duane Truex, Richard Baskerville, Julie Travis (2000): Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of systems development methods, In: Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 1(10), doi:10.1016/s0959-8022(99)00009-0 |