Against Ambiguity

dc.contributor.authorStacey, Martin
dc.contributor.authorEckert, Claudia
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-06T09:06:45Z
dc.date.available2020-06-06T09:06:45Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.date.issued2003
dc.description.abstractThis paper argues that the widespread beliefthat ambiguity is beneficial in designcommunication stems from conceptual confusion.Communicating imprecise, uncertain andprovisional ideas is a vital part of designteamwork, but what is uncertain and provisionalneeds to be expressed as clearly as possible.Understanding what uncertainty informationdesigners can and should communicate, and how,is an urgent task for research. Viewing designcommunication as conveying permitted spaces forfurther designing is a useful rationalisationfor understanding what designers need fromtheir notations and computer tools, to achieveclear communication of uncertain ideas. Thepaper presents a typology of ways that designscan be uncertain. It discusses how sketches andother representations of designs can be bothintrinsically ambiguous, and ambiguous ormisleading by failing to convey informationabout uncertainty and provisionality, withreference to knitwear design, wherecommunication using inadequate representationscauses severe problems. It concludes thatsystematic use of meta-notations for conveyingprovisionality and uncertainty can reduce theseproblems.de
dc.identifier.doi10.1023/A:1023924110279
dc.identifier.pissn1573-7551
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023924110279
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3617
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 12, No. 2
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
dc.subjectambiguity
dc.subjectcollaborative design
dc.subjectcommunication
dc.subjectknitwear
dc.subjectknowledge level
dc.subjectmeta-notation
dc.subjectnegotiation
dc.subjectsketching
dc.titleAgainst Ambiguityde
dc.typeText/Journal Article
gi.citation.endPage183
gi.citation.startPage153
gi.citations.count55
gi.citations.elementYukio Ohsawa, Yoko Nishihara (2009): Niche of idea activations as source of social creativity: A finding from innovation game, In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, doi:10.1109/icsmc.2009.5346834
gi.citations.elementMaud Poulin, Cédric Masclet, Jean-François Boujut (2024): Investigating the effects of spatial augmented reality on user participation in co-design sessions: A case study, In: Computers in Industry, doi:10.1016/j.compind.2023.104023
gi.citations.elementNathan Crilly (2024): Design Thinking and Other Approaches, doi:10.1017/9781009498685
gi.citations.elementWillemien Visser (2006): Designing as Construction of Representations: A Dynamic Viewpoint in Cognitive Design Research, In: Human–Computer Interaction 1(21), doi:10.1207/s15327051hci2101_4
gi.citations.elementChristian Johansson, Ben Hicks, Andreas C. Larsson, Marco Bertoni (2011): Knowledge Maturity as a Means to Support Decision Making during Product-Service Systems Development Projects in the Aerospace Sector, In: Project Management Journal 2(42), doi:10.1002/pmj.20218
gi.citations.elementJulien Phalip, David Jean, Ernest Edmonds (2008): Resolving ambiguity of scope in remote collaboration, In: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat, doi:10.1145/1517744.1517817
gi.citations.elementPatrizia Grifoni, Maria Chiara Caschera, Fernando Ferri (2020): Evaluation of a dynamic classification method for multimodal ambiguities based on Hidden Markov Models, In: Evolving Systems 2(12), doi:10.1007/s12530-020-09344-3
gi.citations.elementMichael Poznic, Martin Stacey, Rafaela Hillerbrand, Claudia Eckert (2020): Designing as playing games of make-believe, In: Design Science, doi:10.1017/dsj.2020.8
gi.citations.elementTomás Flanagan, Claudia Eckert, P. John Clarkson (2007): Externalizing tacit overview knowledge: A model-based approach to supporting design teams, In: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 3(21), doi:10.1017/s089006040700025x
gi.citations.elementJannick Kirk Sørensen (2017): Exploring Constrained Creative Communication, In: International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications 4(9), doi:10.4018/ijesma.2017100101
gi.citations.elementGaetano Cascini, Jamie O'Hare, Elies Dekoninck, Niccolo Becattini, Jean-François Boujut, Fatma Ben Guefrache, Iacopo Carli, Giandomenico Caruso, Lorenzo Giunta, Federico Morosi (2020): Exploring the use of AR technology for co-creative product and packaging design, In: Computers in Industry, doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103308
gi.citations.elementJulien Phalip, Ernest A. Edmonds, David Jean (2009): Supporting remote creative collaboration in film scoring, In: Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition, doi:10.1145/1640233.1640266
gi.citations.elementNathan Crilly (2021): The Evolution of “Co-evolution” (Part II): The Biological Analogy, Different Kinds of Co-evolution, and Proposals for Conceptual Expansion, In: She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 3(7), doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2021.07.004
gi.citations.elementLeah Heiss (2020): Iterative Prototypes as ‘Boundary Objects’: Facilitating Interdisciplinary Collaboration of a Modular Hearing Aid, In: The Design Journal 6(23), doi:10.1080/14606925.2020.1824412
gi.citations.elementMatilda Watz, Christian Johansson, Alessandro Bertoni, Sophie I. Hallstedt (2022): Investigating effects of group model building on sustainable design decision-making, In: Sustainable Production and Consumption, doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.005
gi.citations.elementCatherine Stones, Tom Cassidy (2010): Seeing and discovering: how do student designers reinterpret sketches and digital marks during graphic design ideation?, In: Design Studies 5(31), doi:10.1016/j.destud.2010.05.003
gi.citations.elementOnur Hisarciklilar, Jean-François Boujut (2009): An annotation model to reduce ambiguity in design communication, In: Research in Engineering Design 3(20), doi:10.1007/s00163-009-0073-6
gi.citations.elementClaudia Eckert, Anja Maier, Chris McMahon (2005): Communication in design, In: Design process improvement, doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-061-0_10
gi.citations.elementTomás Dorta, Edgar Pérez, Annemarie Lesage (2008): The ideation gap:, In: Design Studies 2(29), doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.004
gi.citations.elementIestyn Jowers, Chris Earl (2014): Shape Interpretation with Design Computing, In: Design Computing and Cognition '12, doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_19
gi.citations.elementSumbul Khan, Bige Tunçer (2019): Speech analysis for conceptual CAD modeling using multi-modal interfaces: An investigation into Architects’ and Engineers’ speech preferences, In: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 03(33), doi:10.1017/s0890060419000015
gi.citations.elementAnders Barlach, Morten Hertzum, Jesper Simonsen (2013): Pilot Implementation Driven by Effects Specifications and Formative Usability Evaluation, In: Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology, doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4046-7.ch010
gi.citations.elementAmanda Smith, Rachelle Moore (2019): Digital Distortion Through Co-creation, In: Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice 3(8), doi:10.1080/20511787.2018.1524088
gi.citations.elementMartin Stacey, Kristina Lauche (2005): Thinking and representing in design, In: Design process improvement, doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-061-0_9
gi.citations.elementIestyn Jowers, Christopher F. Earl (2015): Extending the Algebras of Design, In: Nexus Network Journal 3(17), doi:10.1007/s00004-015-0259-3
gi.citations.elementJ. T. Brinkmann, D. C. Wynn (2020): ASSESSING, AGGREGATING AND VISUALISING PRELIMINARY DESIGN INFORMATION MATURITY TO SUPPORT COLLABORATIVE DESIGN, In: Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, doi:10.1017/dsd.2020.65
gi.citations.elementClaudia Eckert, Alan Blackwell, Martin Stacey, Christopher Earl, Luke Church (2012): Sketching across design domains: Roles and formalities, In: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 3(26), doi:10.1017/s0890060412000133
gi.citations.elementCHRISTIAN JOHANSSON (2014): MANAGING UNCERTAINTY AND AMBIGUITY IN GATES: DECISION MAKING IN AEROSPACE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT, In: International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 02(11), doi:10.1142/s0219877014500126
gi.citations.elementKevin Ta, Ehud Sharlin, Lora Oehlberg (2018): Bod-IDE, In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems, doi:10.1145/3197391.3205408
gi.citations.elementBenjamin W. Caldwell, Jonathan E. Thomas, Chiradeep Sen, Gregory M. Mocko, Joshua D. Summers (2012): The Effects of Language and Pruning on Function Structure Interpretability, In: Journal of Mechanical Design 6(134), doi:10.1115/1.4006442
gi.citations.elementEujin Pei, Ian R. Campbell, Mark A. Evans (2010): Development of a tool for building shared representations among industrial designers and engineering designers, In: CoDesign 3(6), doi:10.1080/15710882.2010.510197
gi.citations.elementGokula Vijaykumar Annamalai Vasantha, Amaresh Chakrabarti, Bijay Kumar Rout, Jonathan Corney (2013): Influences of design tools on the original and redesign processes, In: International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 1(2), doi:10.1080/21650349.2013.839076
gi.citations.elementIbon Serrano Lasa, Maitane Mazmela Etxabe, Itziar Ricondo Iriondo (2021): New application for sketching in a machine tool company, In: Journal of Engineering Design 1(33), doi:10.1080/09544828.2021.1976398
gi.citations.elementClaudia Eckert, Ola Isaksson, Calandra Eckert, Mark Coeckelbergh, Malin Hane Hagström (2020): Data Fairy in Engineering Land: The Magic of Data Analysis as a Sociotechnical Process in Engineering Companies, In: Journal of Mechanical Design 12(142), doi:10.1115/1.4047813
gi.citations.elementClaudia Eckert, Ola Isaksson, Malin Hane-Hagström, Calandra Eckert (2022): My Facts Are not Your Facts: Data Wrangling as a Socially Negotiated Process, A Case Study in a Multisite Manufacturing Company, In: Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 6(22), doi:10.1115/1.4055953
gi.citations.elementGraham Dove, Michael Mose Biskjaer, Caroline Lundqvist, Jeanette Falk Olesen, Kim Halskov (2017): Constraints and Ambiguity, In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2017, doi:10.1145/3121283.3121310
gi.citations.elementCharlie Ranscombe, Katherine Bissett-Johnson, David Mathias, Boris Eisenbart, Ben Hicks (2019): Designing with LEGO: exploring low fidelity visualization as a trigger for student behavior change toward idea fluency, In: International Journal of Technology and Design Education 2(30), doi:10.1007/s10798-019-09502-y
gi.citations.elementClaudia Eckert, Rafaela Hillerbrand (2022): Models in Engineering Design as Decision-Making Aids, In: Engineering Studies 2(14), doi:10.1080/19378629.2022.2129061
gi.citations.elementEujin Pei, Ian Campbell, Mark Evans (2011): A Taxonomic Classification of Visual Design Representations Used by Industrial Designers and Engineering Designers, In: The Design Journal 1(14), doi:10.2752/175630610x12877385838803
gi.citations.elementClaudia Eckert, Ola Isaksson, Chris Earl (2019): Design margins: a hidden issue in industry, In: Design Science, doi:10.1017/dsj.2019.7
gi.citations.elementRachael Luck (2013): Articulating (mis)understanding across design discipline interfaces at a design team meeting, In: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 2(27), doi:10.1017/s089006041300005x
gi.citations.elementAnders Häggman, Geoff Tsai, Catherine Elsen, Tomonori Honda, Maria C. Yang (2015): Connections Between the Design Tool, Design Attributes, and User Preferences in Early Stage Design, In: Journal of Mechanical Design 7(137), doi:10.1115/1.4030181
gi.citations.elementClaudia Eckert, Rafaela Hillerbrand (2018): Models in Engineering Design: Generative and Epistemic Function of Product Models, In: Design Research Foundations, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_11
gi.citations.elementJulien Phalip, Matthew Morphett, Ernest Edmonds (2007): Alleviating communication challenges in film scoring, In: Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces, doi:10.1145/1324892.1324895
gi.citations.elementTomás Dorta (2008): Design Flow and Ideation, In: International Journal of Architectural Computing 3(6), doi:10.1260/1478-0771.6.3.299
gi.citations.elementClaudia Eckert, Martin Stacey, Christopher Earl (2013): Formality in design communication, In: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 2(27), doi:10.1017/s0890060413000073
gi.citations.elementDeLean Tolbert, Patrice M. Buzzanell, Carla B. Zoltowski, Antonette Cummings, Monica E. Cardella (2016): Giving and responding to feedback through visualisations in design critiques, In: CoDesign 1-2(12), doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1135244
gi.citations.elementJoyce Thomas, Megan Strickfaden (2018): From Industrial Design Education to Practice: Creating Discipline Through Design Sprints, In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94601-6_13
gi.citations.elementGülşen Töre Yargin, Nathan Crilly (2015): Information and interaction requirements for software tools supporting analogical design, In: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 2(29), doi:10.1017/s0890060415000074
gi.citations.elementMaria Chiara Caschera, Fernando Ferri, Patrizia Grifoni (2013): InteSe: An Integrated Model for Resolving Ambiguities in Multimodal Sentences, In: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 4(43), doi:10.1109/tsmca.2012.2210407
gi.citations.elementRachael Luck (2010): Using objects to coordinate design activity in interaction, In: Construction Management and Economics 6(28), doi:10.1080/01446193.2010.489924
gi.citations.elementEric Blanco, Marie-Anne Le Dain (2007): ICT System Requirements in Collaborative Design with Suppliers, In: Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering II, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6761-7_13
gi.citations.elementChristiane Rau, Anne-Katrin Neyer, Kathrin M. Möslein (2012): Innovation practices and their boundary-crossing mechanisms: a review and proposals for the future, In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2(24), doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.647647
gi.citations.elementRachael Luck (2009): ‘Does this compromise your design?’ Interactionally producing a design concept in talk, In: CoDesign 1(5), doi:10.1080/15710880802492896
gi.citations.elementTomás Dorta, Annemarie Lesage, Edgar Pérez (2008): Point and sketch, In: Proceedings of the 20th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine, doi:10.1145/1512714.1512739

Files