Mediating Environments and Objects as Knowledge Infrastructure

dc.contributor.authorHoeppe, Götz
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-06T13:06:06Z
dc.date.available2020-06-06T13:06:06Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThe knowledge infrastructures of the sciences have been considered as human-made networks or ecologies of people, artifacts, and institutions that enable the production, calibration, storage, dissemination and re-use of data. Complementing these studies, this paper examines how scientists use the digitally mediated, shared availability of “natural” environments and objects for infrastructural purposes. Drawing on ethnography and informed by ethnomethodology, I focus on the uses of the sky in astronomical observation. Astronomical research is oriented to observing, and re-observing, sources on the sky, making it its topic. Yet, the sky is also an infrastructural resource, as it provides stable saliences that can be used alongside existing records for ordering work, diagnosing trouble with artifacts in data, and repairing data across diverse sites of practice. I consider a case in which such uses of the sky were new to researchers working in a novel domain, and one in which such uses were already established, but new to a student being inducted to its work. In both cases properties of the sky became salient through being mediated digitally. As existing records and new observations were made available to a single computational order, these data became accessible to what Melvin Pollner called mundane reason, wherein ceteris paribus clauses are used reflexively to maintain a world in common. Although the sky may appear to be an extreme case, I argue that other mediated environments and objects, and the reflexive practices through which these are engaged, have similar infrastructural uses in other disciplines.de
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10606-018-9342-0
dc.identifier.pissn1573-7551
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9342-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3726
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): Vol. 28
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
dc.subjectAstronomy
dc.subjectBoundary objects
dc.subjectCalculative practices
dc.subjectDigital data
dc.subjectEthnomethodology
dc.subjectKnowledge infrastructure
dc.subjectMundane reason
dc.subjectReflexivity
dc.subjectRepair
dc.titleMediating Environments and Objects as Knowledge Infrastructurede
dc.typeText/Journal Article
gi.citation.endPage59
gi.citation.startPage25
gi.citations.count8
gi.citations.elementGötz Hoeppe (2019): Medium, calculation, play: On digital images in scientific practice, In: Social Studies of Science 5(49), doi:10.1177/0306312719871356
gi.citations.elementGötz Hoeppe (2023): Learning from Harold Garfinkel’s Studies of Work in the Sciences, In: Soziologische Revue 2(46), doi:10.1515/srsr-2023-2023
gi.citations.elementGötz Hoeppe (2019): Practical Cosmologies, In: Ethnologies 2(40), doi:10.7202/1056384ar
gi.citations.elementHsiu-Mei Huang, Wei-Shen Tai, Tien-Chi Huang, Chun-Yu Lo (2024): Optimizing inquiry-based science education: verifying the learning effectiveness of augmented reality and concept mapping in elementary school, In: Universal Access in the Information Society 1(24), doi:10.1007/s10209-024-01098-y
gi.citations.elementPetter Grytten Almklov, Kristin Halvorsen, Jens Petter Johansen (2020): Accountability on the Fly - Accounting for Trouble in Space Operations, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 1-2(29), doi:10.1007/s10606-019-09370-z
gi.citations.elementGötz Hoeppe (2020): Sharing Data, Repairing Practices: On the Reflexivity of Astronomical Data Journeys, In: Data Journeys in the Sciences, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37177-7_9
gi.citations.elementRobert A. Farnan, Jonathan Ensor, Anushiya Shrestha, Dilli Poudel, Bijay Singh, Pakamas Thinphanga, Khanin Hutanuwatr, Yogendra Subedi, Sobina Lama, Sangeeta Singh, Richard Friend (2024): Knowledge infrastructures, conflictual coproduction, and the politics of planning: A post-foundational approach to political capability in Nepal and Thailand, In: Political Geography, doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.103002
gi.citations.elementGötz Hoeppe (2021): Encoding Collective Knowledge, Instructing Data Reusers: The Collaborative Fixation of a Digital Scientific Data Set, In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 4(30), doi:10.1007/s10606-021-09407-2

Files